Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 09:58:35 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Nozick vs. de Molinari: The Narcisism of small differences (round 1)  (Read 1874 times)
myrkul (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2013, 12:22:55 AM
 #21

I often think of the 20th century as a dark age in terms of people's access to information.  The fact that we saw the greatest horrors of history committed by governments is not a surprise against that backdrop.

Access to information is an increasing trend. The printing press forced kings to give way to presidents, and play greater lip service to the people (access to guns might have helped a little with that;) ) but ultimately it wasn't enough, because printing presses are expensive things, and the average Joe can't necessarily get one to spread his ideas. The internet changed all that, because the 'zines and pamphlets were suddenly replaced by twitter and blogs. Now everyone can put their ideas out there, and market forces have taken over. Bad ideas wither, good ones spread like wildfire.

BTC1MYRkuLv4XPBa6bGnYAronz55grPAGcxja
Need Dispute resolution? Public Key ID: 0x11D341CF
No person has the right to initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against another person or their property. VIM VI REPELLERE LICET
hawkeye
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 253



View Profile
April 21, 2013, 02:35:38 AM
 #22

I often think of the 20th century as a dark age in terms of people's access to information.  The fact that we saw the greatest horrors of history committed by governments is not a surprise against that backdrop.

Access to information is an increasing trend. The printing press forced kings to give way to presidents, and play greater lip service to the people (access to guns might have helped a little with that;) ) but ultimately it wasn't enough, because printing presses are expensive things, and the average Joe can't necessarily get one to spread his ideas. The internet changed all that, because the 'zines and pamphlets were suddenly replaced by twitter and blogs. Now everyone can put their ideas out there, and market forces have taken over. Bad ideas wither, good ones spread like wildfire.

Access to information is a 2 steps forward 1 step back thing imo.  It definitely increased with the printing press, but then as governments began to institute public education, and radio and TV became in vogue the access to information by the regular citizen seemed to drop.  I only need to look at my parents and extended family to see this.  TV drones struggle to do any thinking at all.

Now we have the internet, and we have seen govts try to censor it, particularly here in Australia where they tried to follow the Chinese model.  I wonder what the future holds.  If there is some as yet unthought of way that access to information will be stunted again, the 1 step backwards essentially.
myrkul (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2013, 02:41:28 AM
 #23

I often think of the 20th century as a dark age in terms of people's access to information.  The fact that we saw the greatest horrors of history committed by governments is not a surprise against that backdrop.

Access to information is an increasing trend. The printing press forced kings to give way to presidents, and play greater lip service to the people (access to guns might have helped a little with that;) ) but ultimately it wasn't enough, because printing presses are expensive things, and the average Joe can't necessarily get one to spread his ideas. The internet changed all that, because the 'zines and pamphlets were suddenly replaced by twitter and blogs. Now everyone can put their ideas out there, and market forces have taken over. Bad ideas wither, good ones spread like wildfire.

Access to information is a 2 steps forward 1 step back thing imo.  It definitely increased with the printing press, but then as governments began to institute public education, and radio and TV became in vogue the access to information by the regular citizen seemed to drop.  I only need to look at my parents and extended family to see this.  TV drones struggle to do any thinking at all.

Now we have the internet, and we have seen govts try to censor it, particularly here in Australia where they tried to follow the Chinese model.  I wonder what the future holds.  If there is some as yet unthought of way that access to information will be stunted again, the 1 step backwards essentially.
Facebook. Wink

BTC1MYRkuLv4XPBa6bGnYAronz55grPAGcxja
Need Dispute resolution? Public Key ID: 0x11D341CF
No person has the right to initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against another person or their property. VIM VI REPELLERE LICET
hawkeye
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 253



View Profile
April 21, 2013, 04:44:47 AM
 #24

lol, good point.
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003



View Profile
April 21, 2013, 04:46:55 AM
 #25



So when will this debate begin?  Grin

myrkul (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2013, 04:53:38 AM
 #26

So when will this debate begin?  Grin
Presumably as soon as iCEBREAKER finishes The Production of Security. It's a short book, but I suspect he's one of those people that actually have a life, so that may take a bit.

BTC1MYRkuLv4XPBa6bGnYAronz55grPAGcxja
Need Dispute resolution? Public Key ID: 0x11D341CF
No person has the right to initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against another person or their property. VIM VI REPELLERE LICET
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!