Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 01:51:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Whitehouse announces new chief technology officer (Crypto expert)  (Read 732 times)
mercistheman (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 08:26:13 PM
 #1

Dr. Ed Felten is a Professor at Princeton university.
He has lectured on Cryptocurrency & Bitcoin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOMVZXLjKYo
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 08:38:29 PM
 #2

Dr. Ed Felten is a Professor at Princeton university.
He has lectured on Cryptocurrency & Bitcoin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOMVZXLjKYo

The government recruits it's soldiers for the upcoming battle. Are the guys parents, by chance, German immigrants?


Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 08:56:40 PM
Last edit: May 11, 2015, 09:37:34 PM by Gleb Gamow
 #3

And, this guy's not Satoshi because...

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2010/11/ftc-names-edward-w-felten-agencys-chief-technologist-eileen

Quote
FTC Names Edward W. Felten as Agency's Chief Technologist; Eileen Harrington as Executive Director

FOR RELEASE
November 4, 2010

TAGS: government  Government  Office of the Executive Director  Commissioners  Competition Consumer Protection  FTC Operations

Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz today announced the appointment of Edward W. Felten as the agency’s first Chief Technologist. In his new position, Dr. Felten will advise the agency on evolving technology and policy issues.

Dr. Felten is a professor of computer science and public affairs and founding director of the Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton University. He has served as a consultant to federal agencies, including the FTC, and departments of Justice and Defense, and has testified before Congress on a range of technology, computer security, and privacy issues. He is a fellow of the Association of Computing Machinery and recipient of the Scientific American 50 Award. Felten holds a Ph.D. in computer science and engineering from the University of Washington.

Dr. Felten’s research has focused on areas including computer security and privacy, especially relating to consumer products; technology law and policy; Internet software; intellectual property policy; and using technology to improve government.

“Ed is extraordinarily respected in the technology community, and his background and knowledge make him an outstanding choice to serve as the agency’s first Chief Technologist,” Leibowitz said. “He’s going to add unparalleled expertise on high-technology markets and computer security. And he also will provide invaluable input into the recommendations we’ll be making soon for online privacy, as well as the enforcement actions we’ll soon bring to protect consumer privacy. We’re thrilled to have him on board.”

Dr. Felten currently is a part-time consultant for the FTC. He will start full time as Chief Technologist in January.

Chairman Leibowitz also announced that Eileen Harrington has been named the agency’s Executive Director. Harrington comes to the FTC from a 15-month stint as Chief Operating Officer at the U.S. Small Business Administration. Previously, she served for 25 years at the FTC, starting as a staff attorney and assuming a variety of senior management positions in the Bureau of Consumer Protection, including Associate Director for Marketing Practices, Deputy Director, and Acting Director. Harrington has a long list of accomplishments from her tenure at the FTC. Perhaps most notably, she received the prestigious Service to America Medal for leading the team that created the National Do Not Call Registry.

“This is a very happy homecoming,” said Leibowitz. “Eileen has made an invaluable contribution to the FTC in the past, and her strong management skills, enthusiasm, and creativity will once again be put to use for the betterment of the agency and for American consumers. We are delighted to have her back.”

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

https://twitter.com/ftc/status/29698305277

Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 08:59:52 PM
Last edit: May 11, 2015, 09:37:15 PM by Gleb Gamow
 #4

And, this guy's not Satoshi because...

http://www.trustthevote.org/sequoia_warns_princetons_dr_felten_not_analyze_machiine

Quote
Voters Must CountMotivation Behind Adoption

Sequoia Warns Princeton’s Dr. Felten to Not Analyze Machiine

Mar 18th, 2008 by Gregory Miller

Nearly unbelievable, but perhaps predictable. The Brad Blog reports on a warning letter that Dr. Ed Felten, Professor of Computer Science at Princeton University has received from Sequoia Voting Systems, should he and a colleague (Andrew Appel) proceed to analyze the Company’s AVC Advantage product.

According to Brad, Dr. Felten has confirmed receipt and authenticity of the communication from Sequoia’s Edwin Smith, Vice-President of Compliance/Quality/Certification.

This Sequoia machine was recently determined to have had serious errors occur during New Jersey’s primary, and New Jersey election clerks have called for independent testing and analysis. At the very least, we should be questioning operations so complex as to require this response from Sequoia when shifting responsibility.

But it is predictable that Sequoia would assert that if N.J. election officials provide one of their machines to Dr. Felten that such would violate their license agreement with N.J. However, its unclear whether NJ outright owns the hardware with a runtime license to the software, or leases all of it, or what exactly are the terms of service. But let’s assume there is a valid enforceable agreement.

The next issue is whether in fact New Jersey has officially called for an analysis, investigation, or independent testing as asserted by this spot-on comment from Livermore National Laboratory’s computer science expert David Jefferson. But the issue of official calls for investigations (perhaps indemnifying Felten et al in their work) may be irrelevant.

The more relevant question is why Sequoia would be willing to take on the additional bad PR over this… unless they really are concerned about what Dr. Felten and DR. Andrew Appel may discover in their analysis.

As I remarked on Brad’s blog, this is another glaring example of why open source approaches are so imperative to the design and development of the machinery so essential to our democracy in a digital age.

Open source machinery (hardware + software) will put an end to these debates about examination, inspection, and review.


If our vote, our choice, and our voice is to be counted, made, and heard in this democracy, we must do this.

http://www.trustthevote.org/author/gam

Quote
Posts by GAM:

26 Nov 2014Biting the Bitcoin; Reflections on the Latest “Bitvote” Buzz
11 Aug 2014Bracing for Inevitable Manipulation
08 Aug 2014“Digital Voting”—Don’t believe everything you think
07 Aug 2014David Plouffe’s View of the Future of Voting — We Agree and Disagree
21 May 2014Expanding Our Leadership Assures Our Potential
30 Apr 2014A New Name; The Same Mission
09 Apr 2014Money Shot: What Does a $40M Bet on Scytl Mean?
31 Mar 2014The “VoteStream Files” A Summary
01 Mar 2014A Northern Exposed iVoting Adventure
24 Jan 2014PCEA Report Finally Out: The Real Opportunity for Innovation Inside
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 09:36:37 PM
Last edit: May 11, 2015, 09:53:12 PM by Gleb Gamow
 #5

And, this guy's not Satoshi because...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin#Selfish_mining

Quote
Selfish mining

This attack was first introduced by Ittay Eyal and Emin Gun Sirer at the beginning of November 2013. The attacker does not normally broadcast the blocks upon finding them. He mines his private chain and eventually (when somebody finds his own block) publishes several blocks at row. This makes the "honest" network abandon their last work and switch to the attacker's branch. As a result, honest miners lose a significant part of their revenue, while the attacker increases profits due to changes in relative hashpowers.
According to the authors it changes the incentives for rational miners and makes them want to join the attacker's pool, increasing the attacker's hashpower (which could potentially lead to a 51% attack).

Other researchers such as Gavin Andresen or academic Ed Felten disagree with this conclusion.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/10/bitcoin-exchange-struggles/?_r=0





https://twitter.com/edfelten/status/449243491244449792

Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 11:32:43 PM
 #6

Well, we all know they aren't bringing this guy in to teach them that inflating the monetary supply won't be a good thing to continue.
mercistheman (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2015, 12:30:44 AM
 #7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Felten
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145



View Profile
May 12, 2015, 02:46:55 AM
 #8


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Felten#SDMI_lawsuits

Quote
However, SDMI appears to have threatened legal action when spokesman Matt Oppenheim warned Felten in a letter that "any disclosure of information gained from participating in the Public Challenge....could subject you and your research team to actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

I wonder if Matt Oppenheim is related to Casey Oppenheim, the tenth follower of https://twitter.com/EdFelten44 if you exclude Ed's personal account follow.

This post may or may not have anything to do with the first reply to this thread.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!