![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 28, 2017, 07:19:02 AM |
|
There might be sufficient numbers of users, developers and miners who don't want Bitcoin with Segwit, who prefer the status quo. You can choose to use that fork if it happens, or you could use both quite easily too (you'd own coins on both forks).
I don't accept that Segwit needs more testing though. Just saying "it needs more testing" isn't very convincing, eithre you have an actual reason, or you don't.
Segwit's been acitvated on Bitcoin testnet for a very long time now, something like 1 year. Lightning is already being tested out on Bitcoin Testnet as a result of that. If professional software engineers running specific tests, that include the more sophisticated use-case for Segwit such as Lightning, cannot convince you, it's difficult to imagine what could.
I agree with 1 point, BIP148 isn't quite what one would think of calling User Activated.
|