This is no proof of cheating! Proof of cheating would require that the dealer knew the next card. Where is the proof that this dealer knew the next card?
So far, it is a breach of the rule by this dealer. This is not BetOnline's fault, except they would have given the order to this dealer. Proof?
In addition, this was a third party studio, so even not BetOnline itself. Except you have proof they gave the order?
But now comes the
key point: One video of one hand of millions of hands played in live dealer casinos?
If this was an intentional fraud scheme, then there would be 1000s of videos, as everything is always visible in live casinos.
Where are those videos?
You can see him finger the card to get a read on it before he flips it away....did the dealer bring his own perforated deck? If this was a rogue dealer, as you suggest, working without the casino's knowledge, then what was his motivation? Did he want to get fired?
I can see that he plays with the cards, but I can not see that he got a read on it?
He pretty sure did not bring his own perforated deck to
one time take the second card. This does not make any sense!
I did not suggest the dealer is rogue.
He did this pretty sure without the order from the casino, because if there was an order, the order would have been to do this habitually. An
one time order from the casino doers not make any sense.
I am not a mind reader and can not tell you what his motivation was. For me it looks like he played with the cards, like players play with their chips.
