Insult in a dispute – Russian national feature

[Alik Bahshi]

Specially for BADecker

Alik Bahshi

Insult in a dispute – Russian national feature

  Insults are the main feature of Russian participants in political forums on the Internet. Usually they have nothing to oppose in a dispute, they don’t even try, immediately in a mat and foul language, moving on to the opponent’s personality, this is especially practiced, as a rule, if there is an ethnic difference. Well, a Russian cannot but insult an opponent on ethnic grounds. This phenomenon is observed in any forum and distinguishes a Russian participant from any other. They themselves do not even understand how low they lower themselves, exposing their national inferiority to the whole world. It should be noted that this national feature does not depend on the degree of education, or on gender, or on social rank. A vivid example of this is Russian President Putin, whose speech at the moment of emotional tension instantly acquires words from the lexicon of gangster jargon.

   The fact that rudeness among Russians is almost at the genetic level is confirmed by the behavior of Vladimir Safronkov, Deputy Plenipotentiary Representative of Russia in the UN Security Council. No, he did not swear, which is usual for any Russian, but his words to the representative of Great Britain “Look at me. Don't take your eyes off. Why are you averting your eyes” sounded among the diplomats as nothing more than a demonstration of the most real rudeness. It is known that anger is a sign of weakness and in this case is caused by Safronkov's impotence to refute the truth that came from the mouth of a British diplomat.
   Yes, and what is far to go, to demand elementary decency from some Safronkov, if rude expressions sometimes escape from the lips of his patron, which a politician of the rank of president could not afford.
   The thing is that getting nasty with Russians is not considered an insult. This is a national trait, a feature, that is, for a Russian, the usual everyday condition that every foreigner who arrives in Russia faces.
      
   04/19/17

[Zlantann]

Insult, arrogance and pride are all present in international politics regardless of the country. It is generally the behavior or trait of mostly developed nations of the world. We have had world leaders such as Donald Trump throw so much insult on developing nation that have portrayed citizens of such countries as no-bodies. Western countries like Russia are directly and indirectly guilty of what you accuse Russia of doing. I might conclude by saying that Russia is comfortable to portray the featured it is accused of openly, but the West showcases its own secretly and cunningly.       

[Alik Bahshi]

Insult, arrogance and pride are all present in international politics regardless of the country. It is generally the behavior or trait of mostly developed nations of the world. We have had world leaders such as Donald Trump throw so much insult on developing nation that have portrayed citizens of such countries as no-bodies. Western countries like Russia are directly and indirectly guilty of what you accuse Russia of doing. I might conclude by saying that Russia is comfortable to portray the featured it is accused of openly, but the West showcases its own secretly and cunningly.       

   I don't do conspiracy theories. What you say about secrets and other mysterious things I do not know. In my conclusions, I rely on known facts, not on secret ones.

[BADecker]

Insult, arrogance and pride are all present in international politics regardless of the country. It is generally the behavior or trait of mostly developed nations of the world. We have had world leaders such as Donald Trump throw so much insult on developing nation that have portrayed citizens of such countries as no-bodies. Western countries like Russia are directly and indirectly guilty of what you accuse Russia of doing. I might conclude by saying that Russia is comfortable to portray the featured it is accused of openly, but the West showcases its own secretly and cunningly.      

   I don't do conspiracy theories. What you say about secrets and other mysterious things I do not know. In my conclusions, I rely on known facts, not on secret ones.

You must be Russian, then. Because your animosity towards them is just as bad as the bad things you say that they are and do. Condemning yourself.

[Alik Bahshi]

Insult, arrogance and pride are all present in international politics regardless of the country. It is generally the behavior or trait of mostly developed nations of the world. We have had world leaders such as Donald Trump throw so much insult on developing nation that have portrayed citizens of such countries as no-bodies. Western countries like Russia are directly and indirectly guilty of what you accuse Russia of doing. I might conclude by saying that Russia is comfortable to portray the featured it is accused of openly, but the West showcases its own secretly and cunningly.      

   I don't do conspiracy theories. What you say about secrets and other mysterious things I do not know. In my conclusions, I rely on known facts, not on secret ones.

You must be Russian, then. Because your animosity towards them is just as bad as the bad things you say that they are and do. Condemning yourself.

  Your conclusion that I am writing is very similar to what the official Russian media say that in Bucha the Ukrainians themselves killed people in order to blame the crime on Russian soldiers who invaded Ukraine. A typical Russian mentality is to kill and blame the murdered person for this murder. It also happened with the Russian crime at Katyn, when the Russians shot 24,000 Polish prisoners and blamed the Germans for it. Traditional Russian approach. How similar it is to what Minister Lavrov said that the US special services tried to poison Navalny in order to shift it to the Russians. So are your thoughts about me. Moreover, you are trying to get away from this topic in a different direction. It would be better if you remembered your rudeness in the comments in my topics.

[BADecker]

The reports are finally coming through, how Ukraine soldiers attack from civilian positions, so that Russians shooting back will kill civilians. But the ploy is failing the Ukraine soldiers. The truth is coming out into the open, that this is done purposely just to make the Russians look bad... at the expense of their own people, the civilian population of Ukraine. Whose side is the Ukraine military on, anyway? Certainly not the side of the Ukrainian populace.


Amnesty International incites anger from the globalist West for telling truth about Ukrainian war crimes and HUMAN SHIELDS

Amnesty International has sparked anger from the usual left-wing globalist crowd in the West for daring to point out the fact that Ukraine is just as guilty as Russia of committing human rights abuses.

According to a report by the organization, investigators have “found evidence of Ukrainian forces launching strikes from within populated residential areas, as well as basing themselves in civilian buildings in 19 towns and villages” in three war-torn regions of the country from April through July.

The report also noted that the Ukrainian military utilized hospitals, schools and private residences in order to escape Russian forces though what the ‘human shield’ tactic really did was invite more casualties as Russian troops continued to attack Ukrainian forces wherever they could be found.

“Such tactics violate international humanitarian law and endanger civilians, as they turn civilian objects into military targets. The ensuing Russian strikes in populated areas have killed civilians and destroyed civilian infrastructure,” Amnesty International’s report said, adding that the results of this were Russian attacks on said civilian infrastructure, Zero Hedge reported, adding:

The report detailed further that in 22 of 29 schools visited by an Amnesty team between April and July, investigators found evidence of prior military activity. Additionally, five instances of Ukrainian troops using hospitals as bases were documented. The report went so far as to stress Amnesty was “not aware” of instances where Ukrainian troops first tried to evacuate civilians from these locations.

“Not every Russian attack documented by Amnesty has followed this pattern. In certain locations in which Amnesty concluded that Russia had committed war crimes – including in some areas of the city of Kharkiv – Amnesty did not find evidence of Ukrainian forces located in civilian areas unlawfully targeted by the Russian military,” the report noted.

The report explained:

...

[Alik Bahshi]

The reports are finally coming through, how Ukraine soldiers attack from civilian positions, so that Russians shooting back will kill civilians. But the ploy is failing the Ukraine soldiers. The truth is coming out into the open, that this is done purposely just to make the Russians look bad... at the expense of their own people, the civilian population of Ukraine. Whose side is the Ukraine military on, anyway? Certainly not the side of the Ukrainian populace.


Amnesty International incites anger from the globalist West for telling truth about Ukrainian war crimes and HUMAN SHIELDS

Amnesty International has sparked anger from the usual left-wing globalist crowd in the West for daring to point out the fact that Ukraine is just as guilty as Russia of committing human rights abuses.

According to a report by the organization, investigators have “found evidence of Ukrainian forces launching strikes from within populated residential areas, as well as basing themselves in civilian buildings in 19 towns and villages” in three war-torn regions of the country from April through July.

The report also noted that the Ukrainian military utilized hospitals, schools and private residences in order to escape Russian forces though what the ‘human shield’ tactic really did was invite more casualties as Russian troops continued to attack Ukrainian forces wherever they could be found.

“Such tactics violate international humanitarian law and endanger civilians, as they turn civilian objects into military targets. The ensuing Russian strikes in populated areas have killed civilians and destroyed civilian infrastructure,” Amnesty International’s report said, adding that the results of this were Russian attacks on said civilian infrastructure, Zero Hedge reported, adding:

The report detailed further that in 22 of 29 schools visited by an Amnesty team between April and July, investigators found evidence of prior military activity. Additionally, five instances of Ukrainian troops using hospitals as bases were documented. The report went so far as to stress Amnesty was “not aware” of instances where Ukrainian troops first tried to evacuate civilians from these locations.

“Not every Russian attack documented by Amnesty has followed this pattern. In certain locations in which Amnesty concluded that Russia had committed war crimes – including in some areas of the city of Kharkiv – Amnesty did not find evidence of Ukrainian forces located in civilian areas unlawfully targeted by the Russian military,” the report noted.

The report explained:

...

A good example of taking the dispute in the other direction. Here is a topic about Russian foul language and rudeness, which is typical for a Russian participant in a dispute and which was demonstrated by you in the comments to my topics. As far as war crimes are concerned, all the Russian lies will be discussed in the Treban after the war. Evil will have to be paid for, and the pay will be high. On this issue, I have topics, but here I ask you to discuss adhering to this topic and not jump to others.