"Bitcoin XT is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin Classic is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin Unlimited is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin ABC is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
The last thing Bitcoin needs right now is even more proposals that only have small distinctions from the previous ones. More proposals = more FUD about division.
If you're going to support larger blocks and/or a dynamic block size, why not stick with Bitcoin Unlimited, since you supported that anyway?
Because each iteration turns out to be shittily put together joke. So they have to slink away and glue a new name on in the hope of attracting more saps.
I laughed extremely loud when I saw some of the
bold claims they make about themselves on their website.
A fork of the stable Bitcoin Core, Bitcoin ABC aims to build on this base with improved code quality.
They only seem to have popped up in the last couple of weeks, and they're already claiming to create better code than Bitcoin Core?