Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 05:26:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: ICO's for Tech - Implementing vs. Creating  (Read 153 times)
BenchCoinToken (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 10

BenchCoin: A Digital Student Property Enterprise


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2017, 03:35:45 PM
 #1

Why are ICO's which are developing a new technology better than those who are simply implementing a new technology?

If technology is only as good as it can be used, what is the general opinion for ICO's which will "use" new technologies rather than "create" new technologies?

I have seen posts such as ICO's are only for developers who are developing necessary technologies and need to develop their technology quickly.  I understand this in theory however I see many ICO's (games, casinos, etc.) which I don't believe are "necessary" at all.

What about ICO's as "crowdfunding"?  Isn't it more important the ICO leads to a successful operation AFTER the ICO finishes?





Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!