Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Stupid remark.
Anti martingale is the same as martingale.
Both have exactly the same result.
They're both as inneficient as any other gambling strategy...
How was that stupid? You basically supported my argument, the same argument you are saying is stupid. I just illustrated the downside of both martin gale and anti-martin gale systems. yeah they are both inefficient because there is really no strategy that will work in gambling. OP is just here trying to win a 7 game in a row, it's just like a challenge.