@theymos, say your mind about Satoshi's identity

[reagansimms]

We can communicate via Email and other social media without having to know each other. Maybe that's how Satoshi and Theymos got to know each other. He may have had skills in a particular area that made Satoshi interested in working with him, then over time he handed over the forum to be managed by Theymos because of his trust and ability. In my opinion, even if Theymos knew Satoshi's identity, he had no obligation to explain it here.

[Lucius]

Do you know what's worse than asking questions like this (which have already been answered countless times)? I've read at least a dozen posts that repeat the same thing (regardless of the fact that admin did not found this forum with Satoshi), but that's something that anyone who has been an active member of the forum for years should know.

There are so many possible candidates who could be Satoshi, but if the man chose to be anonymous why search for what should not be found? If Satoshi is alive and reading this forum, I'm sure he's disappointed by people like this (and their questions), and I'm sure he often says to himself "I gave them Bitcoin, and all they want to know is my identity".

[Samlucky O]

Dear @Theymos Sir, may you clear the air on your own view of Satoshi's identity?
I guess it will come as simple as "No, you don't know Satoshi". 😁.

All being seem silly, my humble apology if the thread may carry disapproval contents to you all.

You are not being serious here @EluguHcman, aren't you? You are just heating your head on a hard nut to crack, I will advice you to allow the sleeping Dog to lie. This matter has been raised repeatedly on who is Satoshi nakamoto really is, and he has chosen to remain anonymous . Even if @theymos happens to know his identity and Satoshi doesn't want to be revealed, do you think theymus will please you to displease Satoshi by revealing him to you?? I think No. So I will advice you just allow the sleeping Dog lie, than trying to let the cat out of the basket. Lolz.
I know theymus will be looking at you with one eye seeping his whiskey and smiling and asking who the fuck is this guy and what he is trying to prove?

[betswift]

The curiosity to know something about the identity of the inventor of Bitcoin, this groundbreaking innovation that changed our perception of money and revolutionized the world, is understandable. But we have to keep in mind that Satoshi chose to remain anonymous for whatever reason that is also benefiting Bitcoin (it keeps it even more decentralized as people don't look up to an "authority figure" for every matter), violating that choice is not the right thing to do.

Agreed through and through.

It's better to stay that way to not to open Pandora's box.

[EluguHcman]

In a general overview of replies on this thread, I assume the discussion was well satisfied and ironically, with the high level of security programs in the Blockchain technology, No ones identity can be known except for individual security fatigue which idealistically Satoshi the developer of Bitcoin anonymity has to live an example of the system.

In as much as his identity remains unrevelable, the decentralization of Bitcoin has come to stay so as it community users identities is being privatized too.

Ideally I made this thread to get to an end of discussing about Satoshi's Identity because nomatter the extent of proof even when he (Satoshi) make himself known, no one will still believe it such as numerous identities has been pointed to be him.

The mentioned of Theymos on this discussion was out of some users skeptic insights pertaining his role on the bitcointalk forum based on the fundamental roles the forum plays on Bitcoin.


What if I come today to say I am Satoshi? I guess no one will believe it. So, I think it should be a dead expectation from now.
And wiith all due respect, I hope to lock the thread now.