Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2024, 05:28:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: SegWit behind us, what should we be excited about?  (Read 565 times)
MadGamer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1031


View Profile
August 12, 2017, 10:54:42 AM
 #1

SegWit locked in and we should see it activated in the upcoming days, just a matter of time. While putting the November hardfork aside, what proposals or features that are under development that we should be excited about?
Coffee135
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 137


View Profile
August 12, 2017, 11:00:12 AM
 #2

It seems to me that there is no reason to worry. Had a lot more reasons for unrest during the first forks 1 Aug. It was a good lesson for the miners. They had to understand that money likes silence, and not only split, but the usual rumors can face loss of money. It does not benefit anyone.
krishnapramod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1078


View Profile
August 12, 2017, 11:17:48 AM
 #3

SegWit locked in and we should see it activated in the upcoming days, just a matter of time. While putting the November hardfork aside, what proposals or features that are under development that we should be excited about?

Once Segwit gets activated the next implementation would be LN (Lightening Network). Already two LN wallets have been tested on bitcoin testnet.

Zap Wallet - http://zap.jackmallers.com

Eclair Wallet - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=fr.acinq.eclair.wallet

https://medium.com/@JimmyMow/announcing-zap-a-lightning-network-wallet-47622acd89fb

https://news.bitcoin.com/acinq-launches-eclair-the-lightning-network-android-wallet/
maeusi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 254


View Profile
August 12, 2017, 11:25:38 AM
 #4

SegWit locked in and we should see it activated in the upcoming days, just a matter of time. While putting the November hardfork aside, what proposals or features that are under development that we should be excited about?

Once Segwit gets activated the next implementation would be LN (Lightening Network). Already two LN wallets have been tested on bitcoin testnet.

Zap Wallet - http://zap.jackmallers.com

Eclair Wallet - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=fr.acinq.eclair.wallet

https://medium.com/@JimmyMow/announcing-zap-a-lightning-network-wallet-47622acd89fb

https://news.bitcoin.com/acinq-launches-eclair-the-lightning-network-android-wallet/
Many thanks for sharing. Hope, their will come more android wallets for lightening network, because eclair seems only to support new devices.
DoublerHunter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 644


View Profile
August 12, 2017, 11:43:06 AM
 #5

We should get excited if segwit will be completely implemented in bitcoin because it will make bitcoin faster and the stuck transactions will get lower and it will be the start for another bull run for bitcoin and it might push the price of bitcoin up to 10,000 USD up to next year, so we better move now and accumulate more bitcoin.
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087



View Profile
August 12, 2017, 12:22:12 PM
 #6

i'm very curious to see what happens with ledgerx. that's happening this autumn. they're throttling the registrations because there are too many of them. you need 5 million minimum to be able to play on there.

also to take positions you have to lock up collateral so potentially a lot of bitcoin will disappear in there.
MadGamer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1031


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 10:46:47 AM
 #7

Once Segwit gets activated the next implementation would be LN (Lightening Network). Already two LN wallets have been tested on bitcoin testnet.

I understand from this that unlike the blocksize debate and SegWit, Lightning network will basically need a third party application to run? so in other words, there is no need for a any fork in order to make this happen? all we need is a bunch of tests and we are good to go?
poolsleeper
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 11:35:18 PM
 #8

Is there any information which can be understand easily about lighting work? Thanks!
error08
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 514


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 11:56:48 PM
 #9

SegWit locked in and we should see it activated in the upcoming days, just a matter of time. While putting the November hardfork aside, what proposals or features that are under development that we should be excited about?

For now, we should wait until segwit be implemented and see how is it going after being used, whether segwit could make blockchain transactions better or not give a significant changes. If segwit could solve major problems of bitcoins regarding high fees and confirmation time that takes hours even days, then we don't have to agreed with segwit2x or Lightning networks. However, if segwit isn't enough for scale solution, then we should worry about chain split if core developers don't agree with it as they have stated to not support 2Mb hard fork.
MadGamer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1031


View Profile
August 18, 2017, 08:12:42 AM
 #10

Is there any information which can be understand easily about lighting work? Thanks!

Everything you need to know about this can be found on Lightning.Network. If you need  more detailed and technical information, check the whitepaper which is also available on the website.


For now, we should wait until segwit be implemented and see how is it going after being used, whether segwit could make blockchain transactions better or not give a significant changes. If segwit could solve major problems of bitcoins regarding high fees and confirmation time that takes hours even days, then we don't have to agreed with segwit2x or Lightning networks. However, if segwit isn't enough for scale solution, then we should worry about chain split if core developers don't agree with it as they have stated to not support 2Mb hard fork.

Another chain split is very likely to happen but once again, I believe only one bitcoin will survive and the other will remain as an alt and die with time. We have already seen how bigger block size are bad, I don't understand why people still want to hard fork once again. Schnorr and SegWit are going to help, a bigger block size will make things worst.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
August 18, 2017, 08:30:28 AM
 #11

1) Segwit isn't behind us. Wait for it to get activated.
2) The hard fork in November is not Bitcoin, forget about it. It's BCH 2.0.
3) You can find most of the information on Google. Anyhow, we shall see increase throughput without the need for a hard fork yet. Just be patient.

Schnorr and SegWit are going to help, a bigger block size will make things worst.
Scaling wise, Schnorr doesn't do much on its own. There's a general misconception regarding that. What you want to be looking at is signature aggregation.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
nexus99
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 18, 2017, 08:43:56 AM
 #12

I am really really excited about Segwit being able to solve the scalability issue. I'm anticipating a breakthrough! Hope it lives up to our expectations
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
August 18, 2017, 08:52:21 AM
 #13

I am really really excited about Segwit being able to solve the scalability issue.
It was never claimed that SegWit solves scalability. Nothing can solve scalability.

I'm anticipating a breakthrough! Hope it lives up to our expectations
I'm fairly certain that you're just writing nonsense for your signature campaign.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!