1) The distribution of BTC sucks (phew, even if those distribution tables might be extremely inaccurate, this is something to consider; also huge amounts of BTC might be irretrivably lost, but still...). Thus, the 99 story continues with BTC, nothing will change; hard news for some hopeless world changing hopers like me...
Distribution sucks? I don think the way you do. Because the less the coins will be, the more they will be valued (and this includes those that are burnt or lost). It's already changing the thinking of the world now, where are you?
2) The slowness of transactions, unless you put a hefty fee to it (what happened to cheap and fast transactions, the original idea [I know, but still, this NEEDS to be solved IMMEDIATELY somehow - it will not happen in the very near and probably also not in the far future.])? BCH shows the way. Is BCH the way? I don't know. Anyway, in spite of all the efforts, BTC is still way too slow/or way too expensive)
Transactions are slow? After SegWit came into existence and implemented, it proved to be way better than the speed used to be few months back.
3) It is still way to complicated for the common public to become (real) BTC owners
Well, it's their fault they didn't get in before. Or the fault of medium that used to negate Bitcoins in front of everyone, and after Bitcoins reaching skies, the same media changed their tune!
4) Most people in the world still have no clue about BTC, partly by lack of information, interest, it needs too much thinking… And hey, we are definitively not in the high time of human reflection and thinking business. But the very biggest part: Never heard of Blockchain, BTC and the like.
It's still relatively new, not even a decade old. See my post above for the reply that applies to this too.
5) In a world of speed, in a world of IT, can BTC, an IT product (!) with it's snail performance on transactions (see 2) survive? Even if transaction speed was improved 1000-fold and fees reduced, considerably so, - and we are fare from there -, it still will be way too slow!
If considering current speeds slow and fees higher, then I think that just like a well that always remain thirsty, even upgrades that take further will be slow only for you.
6) I cannot understand that the BTC community seems to feels so cool about the high fees, something which will not be solved soon. If BTC becomes the world focus, transactions and exchanges need to execute in Milliseconds in order for BTC to become world dominating. Fees need to be low, otherwise BTC will not be used by everybody (original idea?) and it will hold a niche position forever. Financial products trade at lightning speeds, if BTC does it in seconds, it will still be slow, and we are lightyears away from that, probably even impossible to reach...
BTC is infant, and will adhere too many upgrades. Compare the current user base to what it was in 2010, the number is impressive. And the transactions are still being confirmed in max an hour. When you have a website where you can check what's the best amount of sats per byte as well as how many transactions are remaining to be confirmed in various sats per byte slabs (bitcoinfees.21.co), why don't you take advantage of such service?
6) At last, I will hold onto my BTC and BCH and hope, great things will happen, who knows!
It shouldn't be "Will happen", it's already happening.
7) But I'm very doubtful about the long term success, less doubtful about the near future performance, see above.
Everybody thought this won't be a long term success, but then, why does it still exist even after surpassing more than 7 years?
8 ) I don't know much and I am very excited to hear people proving me wrong!
Last but not least, we are not here to put down each other but to help, so nobody is going to prove you wrong, but will "correct" you!
Don't mind, but I think that you are just trying to appreciate BCH over BTC.