Updated the OP to reflect this explanation of the set described below. Will post the same on my website in the near future.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
October 19th, 2017
NOTICE REGARDING UNFUNDED "FUNDED" KAM SET #17
This set listed here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2258677.msg22877122#msg22877122Was purchased in the early summer of 2017 by a customer.
The customer requested the entire set of coins be fully funded by them, with 1 BTC each.
They asked if they could have the coins funded after they were received in person given the high value of Bitcoin currently. After some thought and consideration I made an exception for this user as they were a repeat customer of mine and I had no reason to think they wouldn’t do what they said they would.
After some time this customer asked me to delay their package stating they were going on vacation for several weeks and would contact me when they returned.
Once they returned and requested shipment they requested their set to be shipped with COAs in a separate package to the set. I obliged and shipped their set.
At no point did this customer indicate that they did not want to fund the coins.
- - From the time they got the package until they sold the coins was likely a short time frame as the package shipped out in late August.
Given it was an international shipment, the package could take 2-5 weeks depending upon transit etc.
Then fast forward to last week (October 10th). I got a few messages about a unfunded “funded” set of my KAM coins. To my surprise I had not heard back yet from this customer and found that the set was being auctioned off on the bitcointalk.org forum. It was surprising how quick this set was resold before I could confront the original buyer about funding them.
It was my mistake in trusting this customer to do what they said they would in funding the coins as they initially requested.
All of the messages with this customer have been documented and indicate clearly that this set was supposed to be fully funded by them and given my willingness to work with them to attempt to avoid risk of shipping funded coins, in the end the agreement was broken on their end.
To be clear, this set is in no way an “error” set. There is nothing error-like about it other than that the purchaser reneged on their end of funding the set fully.
COIN ADDRESS LIST:
1FPBzVr7aPD8Mr5oTHdLA5pg465rDKzn3m
https://blockchain.info/address/1FPBzVr7aPD8Mr5oTHdLA5pg465rDKzn3m1JqJJ1P7vXu2hZDkDq8XEkweXXjShqRNms
https://blockchain.info/address/1JqJJ1P7vXu2hZDkDq8XEkweXXjShqRNms15pAT929xj87XsCPy2TvF4aQ28cEDnw7XQ
https://blockchain.info/address/15pAT929xj87XsCPy2TvF4aQ28cEDnw7XQ1KG3nUFbyD6ojyyrCJ7ScAw8PSkpNamRky
https://blockchain.info/address/1KG3nUFbyD6ojyyrCJ7ScAw8PSkpNamRky1P33yps8AnpbFLDwjKxB1dvXdaN481HgQg
https://blockchain.info/address/1P33yps8AnpbFLDwjKxB1dvXdaN481HgQg1LsLAWenYzpeoZrJbEWqdPfYzKe5Uo2mku
https://blockchain.info/address/1LsLAWenYzpeoZrJbEWqdPfYzKe5Uo2mku17WcL12JVCp9kSnr7FPY1iG7g5TAmjUg9V
https://blockchain.info/address/17WcL12JVCp9kSnr7FPY1iG7g5TAmjUg9V16NXE3bAJCbntyrwcWZDK7hh2hc65GHjW
https://blockchain.info/address/16NXE3bAJCbntyrwcWZDK7hh2hc65GHjW-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZ6U0uAAoJEJqyV7+nZNgznXYH+gKC5XjF19mn/SZm6XD8dKPh
whU/CBAzeq4IxQsd0YwAOHe4fWJlQqUYMWqUb/HfJhhmB1FOlLEL94TLjLm9mnok
9/ulLtKVC7qUcGbIEos3raFILQODHCu4KrqTi3BSxIh/IeQ0bTEac5paGnX3mFKK
6MLd4ksFW2BwzivfcSmowH1029v//qSJA+dSZ3yBsV8SbmU+bROb/WS614581L5j
6t662RnLYwVOGu9JavcHDOQw262n2TK5hxKcgdtLe8oczw5Xf+UFIwUgztxrn6dk
N+BGNRy9scVvmUusi/h0FSubSelwfAMlU3Em8pWzwrdxfy/nwjrK+0ugVPmriIU=
=Z9jF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
