This "X sucks therefore Y" nonsense....
No really, do you drink a bottle of wine then come troll the forums?
Shouldn't you be trolling the official AM thread?
You know most have read your bull there and pay no mind to you (you stopped coming after you made blatant hater predictions that ended up being wrong?). I really shouldn't bother, but...
It's directly relevant because the person to which he responded basis his calculations on BFL, Avalon, Bitfury, KnC, and 100TH all shipping and coming online so quick that AM can't maintain 20-25% network share. If X if BFL, then X sucks, and X is not shipping shit close to their estimate, therefore Y is AM, and AM has a proven track record on estimates and delivery, and based on Y's estimates, it can keep up X's actual delivery record.
Mabsark says AM needs 6500 TH/s. At 20%, that's an additional 32500 TH/s by October (ha!).
I don't know where he gets his fantasy numbers, but one thing is he seems to be calculating an AM share purely as a mining bond, which it is not. Reading what the manufacturers estimate, it's 1200 TH by October, but even that is laughable. If it were 1200 TH, AM would only need to put up 270 TH to maintain 20%. Which based on their track record, they seem fully capable of doing, unlike every other single one.
BFL: delayed (string along ponzi crap, sell product X pre-orders, delay, sell product Y pre-orders, ship some of product X, delay, sell product Z pre-orders).
Avalon: delayed and mining with your shit (so that's already part of the current network hash rate).
Bitfury: delayed and don't know they work.
KnC: canceled mars and expensive and who knows how fast they can manufacture those things.
MPOE-PR, newguy05, Mabsark, return to this thread in October for a learning experience.