Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 05:52:32 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: PSA: About 45% of exchanges opened since 2010 have subsequently closed  (Read 814 times)
torbank (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 07:30:08 AM
 #1

And about 45% of those exchanges did not reimburse customers.

Granted, it's a tricky business to be in, and I'm not attacking the industry.

It's just worth thinking about.

Keeping money in exchanges is a huge added risk.

Bitcoin Risk: An Empirical Study
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 07:33:04 AM
 #2

So what's your point?

franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4256
Merit: 4523



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 07:35:06 AM
 #3

And about 45% of those exchanges did not reimburse customers.

Granted, it's a tricky business to be in, and I'm not attacking the industry.

It's just worth thinking about.

Keeping money in exchanges is a huge added risk.

Bitcoin Risk: An Empirical Study

by your estimate but in proper context.

about 45% of exchanges opened since 2010 never had valid licences.
  about 45% of those never reimbursed customers.

propaganda on both sides is bad. so while we all hate the media making bitcoin look bad. trying to make it the banks fault for the decisions naive and ill experienced coders make, should also be corrected.

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 07:36:30 AM
 #4



From: http://www.statisticbrain.com/startup-failure-by-industry/

aceking
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 07:39:49 AM
 #5

none of them had any kind of license , " run by amateurs for amateurs  Grin Grin "
torbank (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 07:47:53 AM
 #6

So what's your point?

First tell me how you watched a four and a half minute video in less than three minutes.

 Grin
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:52:39 AM
 #7

So what's your point?

First tell me how you watched a four and a half minute video in less than three minutes.

 Grin

Never made past the first minute. Many startups fail. Welcome to the business world.

hazek
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 09:10:30 AM
Last edit: June 13, 2013, 12:40:51 PM by hazek
 #8

There is this distorted view of how the market always in any area works because people only tend to see the successful companies not realizing that probably at least 10 other companies tried a similar idea and failed miserably before them.

And often it's not just about being the cheapest or offering the best quality or something completely new, often it's a combination of things that a company has to get just right in order to succeed. Btw this is not something we should regret, in fact we should celebrate this process because it is how progress happens and how the market best(what ever the hell that means in a given moment) serves the consumer.

My personality type: INTJ - please forgive my weaknesses (Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times, tend to respond to conflict with logic and reason, tend to believe I'm always right)

If however you enjoyed my post: 15j781DjuJeVsZgYbDVt2NZsGrWKRWFHpp
AliceWonder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:14:40 AM
 #9

There is this distorted view of how the market always in any area works because people only tend to see the successful companies not realizing that probably at least 10 other companies tried a similar idea and failed miserably before it.

And often it's not just about being the cheapest or offering the best quality or something completely new, often it's a combination of things that a company has to get just right in order to succeed. Btw this is not something we should regret, in fact we should celebrate this process because it is how progress happens and how the market best(what ever the hell that means in a given moment) serves the consumer.

Marketing plays a bigger role than anything else unfortunately.

QuarkCoin - what I believe bitcoin was intended to be. On reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/
kodo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 02:31:07 PM
 #10

Yes exchanges in the Bitcoin world are not stable.. we know.
torbank (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 17, 2013, 07:32:09 AM
 #11

It just pisses me off.

I lost a fair amount with btcex, and MyBitcoin, and GLBSE...

Was away from the computer for months, and oh well.

I guess the main point is don't leave funds on exchanges since there's really no guarantee that your money will be there tomorrow.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!