Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 09:15:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Slander/Defamatory Statements. bhobafett [Also Suspected Alt Accounts].  (Read 262 times)
TagaMungkahi (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 118


Bounty Campaign Manager? --> https://goo.gl/YRVVt3


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 12:57:16 AM
 #1

Hi, First of all Thank you to Sir/Maam Lauda for replying to my message regarding to this matter.
This thread is all about slander/defamatory statements of bhobafett regarding TeleX AI Bounty Campaign which i currently managing.

FACTS:
1. Rules in Facebook and Twitter Campaign is already stated and did not change, which is : You need to RT/Share the post on Twitter/FB TeleX AI Accounts on the given week.
2. I changed the rules of the RT/Share/Tweets/Post counts From 3 to 5.
3. Bhobafett claims that this rules are TOO HARSH for the campaign participants.
4. I am considerate enough to all the participants, changing the rules will not put them into harm and will not make the task complicated.
5. Bhobafett is a shit poster and also a spammer which is enough to be given Negative Trust and to be banned on ALL Campaigns.
6. His Defamatory Statements affects TeleX AI,The ICO, The Bounty and The Bounty Manager's reputation which may lead to the discouragement to another participants/Investors.
Example of his slander/defamatory statements:
Hey TagaMungkahi don't be too harsh on your bounty hunters. You're being too much already! You're work isn't that hard enough to be like that to them! Counting the reports of your bounties which I think not exceeding to a hundred participants isn't too much for you. No wonder there's only few participants here it's because of this manager's attitude. And base on how you changed your rules means you already predict a failed future for this project.
Hey Dev, I think your Facebook manager is being too harsh to your bounty hunters. What's with the changing of rules last week? I think your not that confident with your project's future.
What seems to be the problem of this ICO? From 3 originals posts and reposts, bounties need to do 5 each now. I think this ICO is having hazy future in crypto world.

7. I sent him a PM but he won't settle the issue which leads me to investigate further about this guy. Which opens up another issue: ALT ACCOUNTS
ACCOUNTS CONNECTED
  1. bhobafett https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1109313
  2. bhoybitcoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1075196
  3. cannycassiopeia https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1160610

Why I suspect them that they are alt of each other?
1. This three people are spammers and they both have the same quality of post which is randomly shitposting on different Altcoin ANN/Bounty Threads.
2. They post with the same thread. Sample
Dev, any updates regarding this project please.
Dev, any updates regarding this project please.
I would go into this also. Dev, please give us an update regarding Archain. Still waiting for it for sometime now.
Dev, what took you so long to give us answers to our questions? We needed to know every updates here.

3. Same quality post asking "What is the update Dev" on similar threads.
4. bhobafett and bhoybitcoin are both Filipinos.
5. Another "coincidence"
I replied to bhobafett, bhoybitcoin replied to my post.
What seems to be the problem of this ICO? From 3 originals posts and reposts, bounties need to do 5 each now. I think this ICO is having hazy future in crypto world.
Every rules needs to change in order to make the marketing campaign more effective, you should understand it.

What seems to be the problem of this ICO? From 3 originals posts and reposts, bounties need to do 5 each now. I think this ICO is having hazy future in crypto world.

More effective? Nah!! I don't think so. Its making the rules for the campaign complicated. This project is not confident enough that they will succeed that's why there's a lot of changes every now and then.
6. cannycassiopeia also posted on TeleX AI Bounty Campaign.
  
It's hard to participate in this project. They change their rules every week. Sounds uninteresting and newbie in crypto world. I wish this ico succeed.     Tongue


TL;DR
1. They are shitposters/spammers who deserves a neg trust.
2. Bhobafett posted defamatory statements against TeleX AI Bounty/Campaign Manger.
3. Suspected Accounts Connected: Bhobafett,Bhoybitcoin,cannycassiopeia. This three have the same quality of post, have the same habit of updating different ANN/Bounty Threads.

Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 2218


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 01:16:56 AM
 #2

Both bhoybitcoin and bhobafett are on activity 140 while cannycassiopeia 's 82/82 can be interpreted as a rotation of postings (and all three were created roughly a month apart).

(and the last active being identical for the first two is a dead giveaway)

Quote
Name:    bhoybitcoin u=1075196
Posts:    207
Activity:    140
Date Registered:    21 July 2017, 11:41:46
Last Active:    Today at 04:54:28

Name:    bhobafett u=1109313
Posts:    157
Activity:    140
Date Registered:    16 August 2017, 01:50:21
Last Active:    Today at 04:54:44

Name:    cannycassiopeia u=1160610
Posts:    82
Activity:    82
Date Registered:    19 September 2017, 23:41:39
Last Active:    Today at 05:47:53

Code:
bho

yields ten pages of UID's so it's a little inconclusive that there's a direct connection there given how random the names are.

TagaMungkahi (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 118


Bounty Campaign Manager? --> https://goo.gl/YRVVt3


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 12:58:05 AM
 #3

Thank you Sir,I know that I provided a weak evidence on the suspected connections of the three accounts, but i also hope that their post history will also provide another evidence.,  I hope someone still should give them neg trust for spamming too much. I think that is enough reason for now.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!