(Capitalism)ICO's having a hard time to be listed in centralized exchangers..

[davenjulio]

We could see that almost ICO nowadays having trouble to be listed in centralized exchangers that can provide good liquidity. Most of them don't want to pay the listing expenses which is playing around 50k to 1M usd specially if the ICO is not sold out. A good project could be affected as  ICO's are promising their investors a good liquidy once launch in the market, failures to deliver this promises could resulted in loss of trust and dumping that could hurt the early investors as some are newbies that could possibly think that ico's are scams. So it gives the chances for exchangers to charge ICO bigger payment to be listed in their exchangers once launch..I could tell that this is purely capitalism.. All ideas and insights are welcome, let's have a healthy discussion and exchanges of ideas..

[kevoh]

We could see that almost ICO nowadays having trouble to be listed in centralized exchangers that can provide good liquidity. Most of them don't want to pay the listing expenses which is playing around 50k to 1M usd specially if the ICO is not sold out. A good project could be affected as  ICO's are promising their investors a good liquidy once launch in the market, failures to deliver this promises could resulted in loss of trust and dumping that could hurt the early investors as some are newbies that could possibly think that ico's are scams. So it gives the chances for exchangers to charge ICO bigger payment to be listed in their exchangers once launch..I could tell that this is purely capitalism.. All ideas and insights are welcome, let's have a healthy discussion and exchanges of ideas..

Just a quick question:
How would early investors dump a coin when it has not even reach the exchange?

Even when ICOs deliver their promises on time, coins/tokens still get dumped the moment it hits the exchange and move on to the next ICO. Majority of the so called investors are less interested in the project and what it can offer!

[bob3772]

When we move to decentralized exchanges this will be a thing of the past. Exchanges know they can make more by charging huge listing fees than they'll make in commission from most coins.

[davenjulio]

We could see that almost ICO nowadays having trouble to be listed in centralized exchangers that can provide good liquidity. Most of them don't want to pay the listing expenses which is playing around 50k to 1M usd specially if the ICO is not sold out. A good project could be affected as  ICO's are promising their investors a good liquidy once launch in the market, failures to deliver this promises could resulted in loss of trust and dumping that could hurt the early investors as some are newbies that could possibly think that ico's are scams. So it gives the chances for exchangers to charge ICO bigger payment to be listed in their exchangers once launch..I could tell that this is purely capitalism.. All ideas and insights are welcome, let's have a healthy discussion and exchanges of ideas..

Just a quick question:
How would early investors dump a coin when it has not even reach the exchange?

Even when ICOs deliver their promises on time, coins/tokens still get dumped the moment it hits the exchange and move on to the next ICO. Majority of the so called investors are less interested in the project and what it can offer!

You can find them on decentralized exchangers. Investors will dump their coin totally if they can't see the coin/token to be listed in a good centralized exchanger.
Unlike if a good project coin/token is listed in centralized exchangers there are  investors who will wait for their target with reference to roadmap.

[KryptoKai]

It is difficult to get listed in the bigger exchanges unless they already have a high trading volume and demand. That is why they list on smaller exchanges first before hitting the bigger ones. Also it costs a lot to get into bittrex and binance so the ICO has to be really success to get into those exchanges and have enough for development