How do you think the friends of KYC contradict the concept of decentralization? I think that the authorities again want to get total control! And I think the administrators of the bounty campaigns should warn about KYC at the beginning of the campaign!
The requirement that KYC pass through to the participants in the signature campaign primarily contradicts the principle of anonymity on this forum. Each member of the forum has the right to be anonymous here. using only his nickname.
Concerning the fact that ICO campaigns require signers to provide their identity data and copies of passports in campaign participants, it is almost illegal, since such a check is made against persons investing their funds in order to avoid money laundering laundered by criminal means. Signature campaign participants do not invest their money, and therefore the requirement to provide such data does not make sense. The fact that ICO campaigns require the provision of such data and copies of their documents after the completion of the ICO indicates that it is being used here for the purpose of not paying the earned tokens, since if the campaign participant refuses to provide such data, they simply do not pay the earned tokens. I consider this a fraud and fraud.
