Looks quite useful actually and well done for all the efforts. But I have to say, if an investor is looking for such answers in this solution, instead of looking for it in the website and whitepaper itself, then the investor is better off not investing at all if they cannot do their own research.
On the other hand, if there is information to be found in your service and not on the website or own materials of the project itself, then the project ought to be flagged for not updating information quick or effective enough.
What I mean to say is good service, but it maybe could prove either investor or project as inappropriate?
Thank you for your questions. There are several problems we are solving:
1. We help investors get answers for some questions that they might spend time looking on project website or talking to tech support (if it is available at working hours for that timezone). The investor will do the research anyway but he/she can avoid spending time on a project that does not fit some basic criterias: US investors are not accepted, the team does not reveal previous experience or there is no backing by VCs.
2. Team on the other hand can update answers available on the platform at anytime to at least partially automate question answering. For them it is another way to reach potential audience which is free to use.
Teams can also add chatbot to their channel to have make their answers available by command /ask.
More details
here.
