What you guys are proposing doesn't make sense actually.
I think there are a lot of individuals who do not have anything to hide "with regards to their transaction habits", and it should be quite obvious that he was referring to this rather than what belongings he has at home, etc.
Context -- is important to realise.
So if your transaction habits indicate to your drug addict neighbor that you are hodling 2k in BTC, and he and his buds really need their fix, you're happy he can see that with a copy/paste and a click?
Context -- data is agnostic and what people do with it can't be dictated by your naivety. If you don't want it in the hands of bad guys, you don't want it on a db that has a backdoor and you certainly don't want it on a public ledger anyone can read. If you are counting on criminals never linking you to an address, you are counting on analytics never progressing (though they are quite advanced now and linkages are most certainly possible to all but those who are mercilessly performing opsec--of course those people would gladly use a private ledger to save them the time/effort/odds-of-a-mishap).
If you read carefully, I am SPECIFICALLY addressing the points in the previous posts by NeuroticFish and Tutankrypto, etc.
And *that* was the
context of my post.
also, an inquiry that I have earlier posted:With so many other projects also introducing privacy features, including WanChain, and even Stellar, and what not, to enable private channels and transactions -- on top of the other features that they also offer + business partnerships and some even actual real-world adoption, I wonder what makes Monero appealing?
It does have a good brand name and recognition though, being the first market driver in privacy, and a pretty substantial community base.
I'm still not quite sure if I would be putting more into XMR though at the moment. But would love to hear what you guys think.