Likely Chain-Bet.com Shills/Alt accounts

[DarkStar_]

Chain-Bet.com (previously BitcoinBetting.website) is a gambling site with a presence here on Bitcointalk. Their many features include an industry leading 37.5% house edge, and of course, shills. I've noticed many accounts that seem to mostly post advertising them, and arguing for them in the past, and they all seem similar. While I do not have concrete proof, I am fairly certain that a large portion, if not all, are alt accounts or shills. Please take a look at their posting history - you will notice many similarities. Can you really imagine normal players posting some of the things they post? A large amount of their posts plug Chain-Bet or BitcoinBettingWebsite in some way. Their main is Bitcoin Gambling.


MarbleBoss
Warren Buffet
Jimmy Wales
DutchDemon
Angelina Jolie
Rupert Murdoch
LoveUJack
100bitcoin (wearing their signature)
newIndia (wearing their signature)
RocketSingh (wearing their signature)

Thoughts? I like their line of "famous people" usernames.

[Joel_Jantsen]

I'm not sure about the other names but RocketSingh (one with their signature) is most likely getting paid to advertise them.If you have been frequent lurker in the gambling section,you might have noticed that pumping threads is a new trend followed followed by the C graded gambling websites.For instance posting history of this account clearly shows it's a shill.

Since it's a gambling section,it's hard to tag accounts without any solid proof..

[Welsh]

Yeah, probably alt accounts if not they've likely been paid to bump the service. Unfortunately this is quite common practice in the Gambling and altcoin sections and doesn't show any signs of slowing down. The mods are trying their best but, as soon as they deal with 100 accounts another 100 pop up.

[Bitcoin Gambling]

Chain-Bet.com (previously BitcoinBetting.website) is a gambling site with a presence here on Bitcointalk. Their many features include an industry leading 37.5% house edge, and of course, shills. I've noticed many accounts that seem to mostly post advertising them, and arguing for them in the past, and they all seem similar. While I do not have concrete proof, I am fairly certain that a large portion, if not all, are alt accounts or shills. Please take a look at their posting history - you will notice many similarities. Can you really imagine normal players posting some of the things they post? A large amount of their posts plug Chain-Bet or BitcoinBettingWebsite in some way. Their main is Bitcoin Gambling.


MarbleBoss
Warren Buffet
Jimmy Wales
DutchDemon
Angelina Jolie
Rupert Murdoch
LoveUJack
100bitcoin (wearing their signature)
newIndia (wearing their signature)
RocketSingh (wearing their signature)

Thoughts? I like their line of "famous people" usernames.

1. I can run a gambling game with 99% house edge. As long as the game is provably fair, u have no right to say anything. I have not forced anyone to play my game. Those who are playing, are playing willingly. U r not the authority to decide what house edge a game should have. There is nothing scammy in having a BIG house edge.

2. Many of the profiles u have mentioned are investor in my bankroll. Here is the investment thread to query about investment - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2239307.0. Investors have vested interest to promote the game and there is nothing scammy in that either.

Feel free to ask any other Q that u may have and once u r done, please consider to remove the -ve trust u have left on my profile.

[dvillier]

Ok Lauda is going to give them negative trust.you don't need to worry. After she give negative feedback then you need to start supporting her.
And slowly destroying accounts in this way and in last you people will fall this forum also.

[Bitcoin Gambling]

Ok Lauda is going to give them negative trust.you don't need to worry. After she give negative feedback then you need to start supporting her.
And slowly destroying accounts in this way and in last you people will fall this forum also.

Sorry. Dint get your point.

[DarkStar_]

Ok Lauda is going to give them negative trust.you don't need to worry. After she give negative feedback then you need to start supporting her.
And slowly destroying accounts in this way and in last you people will fall this forum also.

I'm willing to reconsider, and I have done so for a few of the ratings I left already. I've updated my negative to a neutral, as I do agree it was too much based on suspicions.