Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 02:47:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Quarkchain speculation to go up like ziliqa?  (Read 544 times)
Bowtiesarecool
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 295


View Profile
June 08, 2018, 07:00:52 AM
 #41

The whole deal with QKC circulating supply and Binance listing has me turned off on Binance. I'm no stranger to the underbelly of the decentralization, but this is classic greed at play - the kind of greed that topples empires. When regulators finally step in, this will be remembered as that moment it all changed
dead_m92
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 650
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 08, 2018, 07:04:48 AM
 #42

Well, it went up by more than x15 during the first day of Listing on binance, so i think that it has been already moved a lot like Zilliqa, i do not understand why it has been pumped so hard.

.


.



                ███
             █████████
          ███████████████
        ███████████████████
       █████████████████████
       █████████████████████
       █████████████████████
       █████████▀▀▀▀▀██████
    █████████▀        █████████
 ███████████▌  ▄████▄▄████████████
████████████▌  ████████████████████
█████████████   ▀▀▀▀  █████████████
██████████████▄▄     ▄█████████████
███████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████
 █████████████████████████████████
    █████████         █████████
       ███               ███
.


.


.
.
.


.
.
WhitePaper
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.



BTCITA187
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 14


View Profile
June 08, 2018, 01:43:17 PM
 #43

The whole deal with QKC circulating supply and Binance listing has me turned off on Binance. I'm no stranger to the underbelly of the decentralization, but this is classic greed at play - the kind of greed that topples empires. When regulators finally step in, this will be remembered as that moment it all changed
By the way, I also do not understand the position of the exchange Binance, they really did not know that such a pump would be? If you do not know that somehow strange turns out. After all, it seems before listing on Binance you need to go through serious verification and just like that you can not conduct a listing on Binance. If the Binance really knew it would be a pump, it turns out they, too, were involved and supporting such pump. It's bad for such a serious exchange. But now, they may make a profit, but in the future will cease to perceive Binance seriously.
Dontme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 255


View Profile
June 08, 2018, 01:50:46 PM
 #44

Its been a question for all who believes and got late to enter ziliqa token before and now that this Quarkchain has been so many special attributes that they can say can be the same move or more than ziliqa.

It landed on idex and got a good high price there about x9-x10 i think not to be exact. After that kucoin exchange and idex made it better to pull its price up on before binance list this coin. Now that we have seen the price was going down is it going to be like ziliqa anymore or its just a well played plan after listing on binance so many dumpers possibly investors and the dev dump their QKC tokens. What do you think it may go down atleast x3-x5 price or its current Lowest price will sustain for its support and wait for a good accumulation.?


I see that quarkchain and zil are very hype project where almost all investors want to invest tgere when their ICO still running but when I sell that it is already listed in binance and I think almost 14x from the ico price after that quarkchain now are crushing slowly.
preshpr1nce
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 60


View Profile
June 08, 2018, 01:58:06 PM
 #45

The whole deal with QKC circulating supply and Binance listing has me turned off on Binance. I'm no stranger to the underbelly of the decentralization, but this is classic greed at play - the kind of greed that topples empires. When regulators finally step in, this will be remembered as that moment it all changed
By the way, I also do not understand the position of the exchange Binance, they really did not know that such a pump would be? If you do not know that somehow strange turns out. After all, it seems before listing on Binance you need to go through serious verification and just like that you can not conduct a listing on Binance. If the Binance really knew it would be a pump, it turns out they, too, were involved and supporting such pump. It's bad for such a serious exchange. But now, they may make a profit, but in the future will cease to perceive Binance seriously.

The problem with QKC goes like this:
They did a tiny ICO holding most of the supply themselves.
They payed exchanges stupid money to get listed instantly, it's rumoured they payed Binance over 5 million dollars
They are releasing something like 3% of the huge supply each month, by December if the price can hold over 20 cents they've made over 500 million dollars
Why the fuck does such a small team need that type of money? does this look like a balance of a job and improving blockchain or 2 guys trying to get wealthy quick?
I took advantage of the hype but going forward I won't hold a cent of this coin, even if they deliver the fact they think their work is worth that much and the fact they took such an obvious approach sums it up for me, 30 million raised in an ICO is once in a lifetime for most people, it's link winning the lotto, I hope it crashes to 1 cent so they learn a lesson.

And yes Binance should know better, this is very clear bs even if it's not a scam, Binance make a lot more money than 5 million in a year and they've just sold out to this garbage.

I am not saying this is a scam, just very unethical and it's lost the volume required to support price increases with these monthly 3% dumps, I wouldn't invest long term on this.
coconutter
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 08, 2018, 02:25:47 PM
 #46

it is not the same as zilliqa, you can not compare it with it because there are a lot of differences, also, quarkchain is now going down and it is not as bullish as it was at the beggining, a lot of people sold

Last follen star
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 5


View Profile
June 08, 2018, 03:36:59 PM
 #47

I like the project guarchain and he showed a good profit, many dissatisfied with this story with binance, but I think this was the right decision. Those who were expecting more growth after going on the binance were distressed and now shout about it everywhere.
Raja_MBZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1505



View Profile
June 08, 2018, 03:55:44 PM
 #48

A good response by Quarkchain team on all the queries & allegations --- must check it out:

https://steemit.com/technology/@quarkchain/response-to-the-article-quarkchain-red-flags-we-know-something-you-don-t-know

Most interesting part:

Quote
“Why Quarkchain still using PoW rather than the recently more popular PBFT algorithm? It is because the limitation of PBFT algorithm that the number of nodes that PBFT can support is very limited (not more than 50 nodes). Zilliqa is using PBFT+PoW, a hybrid and improved consensus algorithm. It is clear that what Quarkchain team try to accomplish is rather trivial. They don’t have the technical know how on how to make a robust and secured sharding blockchain. They have no idea how to handle the issues of state sharding.”

Response:

Quote
QuarkChain is using PoW for its consensus protocol for shards. “Why not PBFT?” Nobody defined PBFT is more popular. In fact, those representative ones like Bitcoin and Ethereum are all using PoW. “What QuarkChain team try to accomplish is rather trivial” -- Does this mean “scalability is trivial”? We think the majority of blockchain society won’t agree with that. As stated in the previous response, our core developers have years of experience working on solving scalability problems in large scale distributed systems in Google and Facebook. How do the author conclude that “ they have no idea how to handle the issues of state sharding”?
kenellis2017
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 12, 2018, 08:40:57 AM
 #49

I feel something is not normal for QKC with a total supply of 10000000, too terrible. I think investing is risky and not investing in this.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!