I don't think you understand what open source means.
I think i understand
I think you dont understand what i mean
I understand perfectly well. From Wikipedia:
"In production and development, open source as a development model promotes a) universal access via free license to a product's design or blueprint, and b) universal redistribution of that design or blueprint, including subsequent improvements to it by anyone."
You sure aren't allowing universal access via a free license, and I very much doubt that you would allow universal redistribution of it if somebody happened to buy it. Unless either of those things are false, then this is very decidedly not open source.