There has been a clamor call by some hunters to either be paid with a stable coin or some percentage of the project token and other with a stable coin except for projects already trading with remarkable liquidity. This has become necessary because of many failed projects and some dubious managers.
We have witnessed very scanty project paying in stable coin, but these projects usually have very small budget, and will even have a limited spot for signature campaigners, most will prefer a minimum of Full Members and above with a maybe just 10 spot or less for each, usually above Full members would be 4 participants only. We sometimes would see a budge of like $50k -150k in a stable coin, but when it comes to payment with the project token, we would see a budget of $1,000,000 to even $3,000,000 or more with much participants. Most times these projects that pay in their own coin usually either scam, fail or price will just dump badly resulting in a wastage of time, and most often time than not, they turn their back and accuse bounty hunters of dumping at any ridiculous price, we all know this is nothing but a shitty falsehood to just give a dog a bad name so as to crucify it. This has made some persons to abandon bounty hunting.
I think project and bounty managers should reconsider how to be reasonable in payment to their marketers if they really mean business and not out to scam investors. If most persons choose never to join bounty that pays in their native coin only, bounty event may take a new turn and be revived and attractive again.
Friend, what do you think of these experience and acting?
I have been to a lot of campaigns where the developers act like that, this is one of the reasons why I'm very choosy on what will I promote, in this current situation it's much better to go on leave that promote ICO, unless you stumble a good project to promote.
