So what? Anyone can set up a node and add any amount of Bitcoin to provide liquidity to LN.
Controlling such a large portion of Lightning capacity, or even more than half, does not present an insurmountable stability risk to the network.
How about Bitmain having enough gear to account for 99% of BCash's network power? Also, more than half of BCash's nodes are controlled by one party, how about that?
Nonetheless, the specter of Bitcoin.com’s Ver remains, the entrepreneur firmly in support of on-chain scaling solutions such as altcoin Bitcoin Cash’s 32MB block size increase.
I hope they keep supporting on-chain scaling; the more on-chain scaling BCash goes through, the sooner it will turn into a pile of rubbish, especially if they want ICO's and DAPP's to run on top of it. Failure guaranteed. Fake Bitcoin. Fake Ethereum. Fake supporters.