ICO's success is just getting listed in an exchange or more than it?

[Wakhid Mukti]

In my opinion, the exchange is one of the media for product development and to facilitate other investors to enter to support the project, because they lost the opportunity to participate in the ICO. In other words, Exchange is an exchange transaction. But not all goes well here, many factors influence the increase in the value of tokens from a platform. in 2017 I attended ICO Minexcoin (MNX) with a base price of $ 5 but after entering the exchange for 3 months followed by other developments the MNX value rose sharply to $ 65. Now, this is an example, that the ICO project that has entered the exchange and is balanced with further development will get traction and positive value in the eyes of the community and impact on the addition of value due to continued adoption.

[richcorner100]

ICO will be called succes if  their token price when listed on the exchange above ICO price by minimun 50%. And the company has program to protect their investor by program buy back and burn token model, like Binance Coin. Now many price of token below ICO price even going down 90% from ICO price but the team developer does not have any plan to increase the price.

[aeternus]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

If the icos you are talking about are legitimate as you are saying then you do not have nothing to worry, the reason the price is not going up has more to do with the market than with anything else, but if you are mistaken it is entirely possible the price of the coins you are holding will never go up and it could crash in the next months, so for the time being you need to trust that your due diligence was good enough to separate the scams from the legitimate projects.

[traderethereum]

getting the list in an exchange is the second part of success from the ico after the ico is ended their crowd sales. and they have hard work to stay survive in the exchange, and they need to continue the progress of their projects. and if they can reach their goals from their plan, then I think this is the real success in the long-term, and not all project can achieve this because sometimes the project abandoned in the middle of the way and the dev leave the project without any information.

[xuan87]

No, the most important thing from ICO is the coin able to go up or being adopted by companies, getting listed is the first step, but the measurement of success project is not stop until that point, the investors need profit and want some proved that the coin can be a good investment

[libert19]

Main success would be achieving what they wrote in whitepaper. In most ICOs, final product turns out to be very different (bad!) than outlined in whitepaper.

[Menawi12]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

Getting listed on exchanger is one of many success of ICOs. The most important thing successfull ICOs is when they can fullfill their whitepaper into real product and become working product.

[tondenga2122]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

The development of the project is more important than force listing on the bad exchanger.
Sometimes it can really affect the value of the coins/tokens.