You can ignore an unprecedented event by the single most experienced person alive and assume your opinion is better than his but no offense bro I'll stick with Justice Stevens unprecedented move by offering his opinion.
Justice Stevens also thinks that the second amendment should be banned. Should I consider him an expert in the field and instantly agree with what he thinks? Disregarding everything else? Just because he's a Supreme Court Justice, wouldn't make his opinion any more important on the matter in my eyes -- I think he's someone that doesn't like Kavanaugh due to his political views and he's without a doubt not going to support his nomation. He's a Democrat, plain and simple with no reason to have to like the guy (it's not like he's on the court and has to keep his opinion to himself)
What are you talking about with that red herring? I noticed you didn't answer the question. Nothing about asking for the POTUS to open a supplemental background investigation after new allegations is unethical, illegal, immoral or anything. Bush did it for Thomas as referenced above.
I said what I said before because you said...
The question now is would you call the President and ask him to get the best agency in the world to try to clear your name? Or would you sit back and the black cloud hang over you and let everyone make an uniformed decision based on no facts.
I went further into saying why I didn't support the rest of the investigations, though YOUR COMMIE BASTARD SELF, only quoted a portion FAKE FAKE FAKE NEWS.
It's always fun chatting with ya Hellfish!
EDIT -- This seems like a good video for people who don't really know what's going on right now,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWXOaH12X5g
