Futurepia Vs EOS Vs Ethereum. Who’s Gonna Win The War?

[ranamajid007]

Blockchain isn’t about cryptocurrency, it has become a way of life now, which will find its use in almost every sector of life from public sector to private and from banking to social media applications. But choosing a right blockchain mainnet is not easy, rather a difficult to decide yet very important for any blockchain project. While deciding which mainnet to go for, DApps or other blockchain projects always keep in mind alteast these 3 aspects:

TPS (Transaction per second) Speed
Scalability
Security
It can be seen it the last few years that Ethereum and EOS have faced immense issues when they were trying to increase the speed and security of their platforms. In order to better understand the issues, let’s first dive into the algorithm or the consensus models on which these blockchains work.

Bitcoin works on PoW (Proof of Work) — safer but slowest
Ethereum works on PoS (Proof of Stake) — less safe but faster than PoW
EOS works on DPoS (Deligated Proof of Stake) — least safe but faster
Futurepia works on DDPoS (Dual Delegated Proof of Stake) — safest and fastest

Futurepia’s mainnet DDPoS algorithm has surpassed the processing speed of both PoS and DPoS platforms. While Ethereum has 15 TPS, EOS has around 100,000 TPS, Futurepia’s mainnet is expected to handle 300,000 TPS.
Here is a pictorial comparison:



Futurepia’s faster DDPoS algorithm is better than other algorithms because of the following differences:

i) More secure: In case of DPoS, since only 21 nodes are in charge of keeping the network alive, it is vulnerable to “51 percent” attack. On the other hand, DDPoS is developed to solve the existing PoS’s problem of speed and DPoS’s problem of security. Instead of 21 BPs we combine 17 master nodes with 4 random nodes, making it far less vulnerable to network attack and collusion.

ii) Much faster: KOLAS is the Korean certification board recognized by 72 countries, in accordance with the international relevant standards. KOLAS has assessed and certified that FUTUREPIA’s Social Media Mainnet transaction speed is 300,000 TPS.

iii) A mainnet dedicated to high traffic DApps:

Futurepia not only provides mainnet core engine API but also other useful modules like live streaming, smart wallet, communication network and P2P cloud API. This would make DApp developers develop the apps easily and grow faster.

Hence the winner is obvious: Futurepia wins the war between mainnets and has been recognized as the most secure and latest technology during the Blockchain Leadership Summit in Switzerland. Team Futurepia won the 1st place during the pitch deck competition.



Let me know what you think.

Join Futurepia Telegram Community Here: https://t.me/futurepia_blockchain

Website: https://futurepia.io/
Whitepaper: https://futurepia.io/assets/img/FUTUREPIA_WhitePaper_EN_v1.1.pdf
Medium: https://medium.com/futurepia

[Hunnykaushal31]

Never heard about Futurepia before ,  ETH and EOS both are good projects. ETH already planned good things in coming year so ETH gonna rocks more as per me.

[ranamajid007]

Yeah its quite new. Mainnet is ready and testnet will be out in a few weeks. The best thing is the promising 300,000 TPS (which is quite high compared to EOS, ETH) and many other blockchains. EOS got the edge for coming out in the very beginning so most of the new blockchains will always have a bit of tough time to get recognized and get adopted.

[anggriani]

I have read the article that you wrote and from the comparisons you make that futurepia is more promising than eth and eos. Are you a team or futurepia developer? I think it is too early for futurepia and maybe the community in this forum is not too familiar with it, therefore it is better for futurepia to continue developing the project, so that it can prove that futurepia is better and can win this war.

[ranamajid007]

Yeah like the co-founder of Ethereum said,  “There are always problems with early technology. It takes time.” Futurepia came out late and since marketing strategies (like airdrops, bounties) dont work that well as they used to be few months ago, they aren't focusing on those marketing means. I hope their product will speak of themselves.

[anggi]

no one knows in this case, i never heard about Futurepia, but the 3 are still doing a pretty good development to date. this might get the answer in the future, when 1 coin tends to be noticed more than other coins.

[ranamajid007]

Talking about development let me clear few things out:

i) Ethereum literally sucks. I know lots of DApps are based on Ethereum platform but with a TPS speed of just 17, it is literally impossible to provide real services. Moreover Ethereum comes with high gas fee. In a fair  SocialMedia world, Ethereum should not make users pay fees whenever they post or comment. Or to wait in a long line to post or to comment.


ii) EOS: Much faster but again lacks decentralization hence lacks security. It is vulnerable to weak attacks and DApp developers pay around 1-2 million USD to use the mainnet.

iii) On the other hand, Futurepia is designed their own consensus algorithm of DDPoS (dual delegated proof of stake) to enhance security, scalability and speed issues. and have verified by KOLAS that the TPS speed tested using 3 test nodes was around 300,000 TPS. Also DApps dont pay any sort of usage fee.

Thats why I say Futurepia is much better than EOS or Ethereum. There might be other blockchain protocols better than EOS, ETHEREUM but just like Futurepia the only drawback they have is late entry to the market.