@THEYMOS YOUR DT1 MEMBERS ABUSED ME WHY ARE YOU ALLOWING IT ?

[itomarketing]

@THEYMOS YOUR DT1 MEMBER ABUSED ME WHY ARE YOU ALLOWING IT ?

Are you keep ignoring that massiv problem ?
Show me a single proof that i'm thule like suchmoon claims.
He admits he has no evidence just assumption.Other people assumed i'm an old of QS,cryptohunter etc.
Will i also get tagged as being an alt of them ?


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100071.0

An alt account of an untrustworthy member, dome say Thule, some say crypyohunter - doesn’t matter exactly which account but I would not trust this user

So because some say i'm an alt of thule and some say i'm an old of cryptohunter i'm getting tagged as scammer by another DT member not important which my main account is ?
This pathetic underhuman forget tagging me as an alt of QS.

Is that the quality DT members are tagging members here?Any more question why DT members are being called abusers and scammers?
So no evidence and he even doesn't care just made the assumption because somebody say that i'm an alt of an untrustworthy account.

If thats not a DT ABUSE of it finest


and here another one from the same group of course

Someone is mad and does not understand how the forum works .... sorry!!

So now i'm getting tagged as scammer for being mad ?
Is it now even not allowed to be mad on that forum ?Any other rules i missed from our beloved DT members?




SO I'M NOW OFFICALY BEING CALLED A SCAMMER OF THIS BOARD BECAUSE I WAS/AM MAD ?
WHO DID I SCAM ?


I WILL CREATE EACH DAY A THREAD DEMANDING A REPLY FROM YOU ON THAT TOPIC SINCE ITS YOUR FAULT THAT DT MEMBERS ARE ABUSING THEIR POWER AS ITS YOU GIVING THEM INDIRECTLY PERMISSION TO DO SO BY SITTING SILENT.

I WANNA KNOW IF YOU SUPPORT THEIR ABUSE AS IF YES I'M GOING TO STOP PARTICIPATING ON THIS FORUM AND WILL ONLY FOCUS ON MY BUSINESS.YOUR FORUM IS NOT WORTH TO SUPPORT IF YOU ALLOW THIS KIND OF ABUSE

It just proofed right opening a new account to voice my opinion as you can clearly see if i would have posted with my real account they would have started destroying and defaming it without evidences.

I would also like to ask how does it come that some alts get a single time tagged and just "assumpted" alts from Laudas group gets like 10 times tagged for the same ?Is this dependand on how much they want to defame someone ?

[YOSHIE]

I would also like to ask how does it come that some alts get a single time tagged and just "assumpted" alts from Laudas group gets like 10 times tagged for the same ?Is this dependand on how much they want to defame someone ?

In one number of 10 tag users it depends on the criteria of each member of DT1 if the Laudas group is more than the limit of 10 tags, then Laudas will choose people who are more useful for him.
(theymos) edit: says, I tend to encourage people not to worry about small details like this, and instead just think of systems with extensive scratches. If this produces a bad result, then it's a problem for me.
So there is nothing to defame someone.

And I want to insist on my suggestion regarding trust: guest should see some trust.

The main reason that I went for this solution rather than forcing custom lists is that I would like to show some trust indicator to guests. But before doing that, I want to see whether these modifications can actually be made to work. If not, then I may go to the force-custom-lists solution, and that's incompatible with guests seeing any trust indicators.