Think of Bitcoin Financially

[barbara44]

I think it is quite possible to sustain as long as there is money coming into bitcoin however the reality is that "unregulated" brings in another opponent with decentralization. Its not regulated but it also doesn't have to be, it has decentralized system which makes it require no trust at all.

So, when banks can leverage the hell out of their positions with no money at all and get 100 dollars from you while give 1000 dollar loans based on that, bitcoin requires straight up money to buy and can't buy with anything else.

However, you are forgetting that money doesn't have to be going into bitcoin to get to 19k, you can literally have sellers denying to give up that much and you can have people buying bitcoin as much as the miners easily since its already x100 times that size so in the end you will just have some people buying bitcoin from miners and the price would be skyrocketing. All we need is stop sellers from selling.

[cocoadreamboy]

I think it is quite possible to sustain as long as there is money coming into bitcoin however the reality is that "unregulated" brings in another opponent with decentralization. Its not regulated but it also doesn't have to be, it has decentralized system which makes it require no trust at all.

So, when banks can leverage the hell out of their positions with no money at all and get 100 dollars from you while give 1000 dollar loans based on that, bitcoin requires straight up money to buy and can't buy with anything else.

However, you are forgetting that money doesn't have to be going into bitcoin to get to 19k, you can literally have sellers denying to give up that much and you can have people buying bitcoin as much as the miners easily since its already x100 times that size so in the end you will just have some people buying bitcoin from miners and the price would be skyrocketing. All we need is stop sellers from selling.

complete and total fantasy. you can't stop sellers from selling. and miners will dump 1800/day bitcoins so unless bitcoin is absorbing more than $30million per day it is not sustainable.

https://www.amsinger.org

[romero121]

I've been in BTC for many years. At no point have I ever given the slightest shit about mining. It's not my problem. It's not my concern. I pay it zero attention.

Miners take care of themselves. The algorithm takes care of the economics of mining. What it costs them is their problem. If they can't take it someone else will.

Any miner attempting to defend a price will wind up ruined in a very short period of time. At heart miners are service providers. They follow the price, not lead it.

From your view, it is miners who are the service providers. The same way if everyone thinks then it won't take time for the network go down. Mining function on its algorithm, but there needs to be investment expecting return. On last year's market there isn't any big profiting for miners while the equipments were high priced. That's true even when they tried for a block size concensus finally everything got winded in a short.

[Naida_BR]

Bitcoin is not a stock, an annuity, a simple commodity, or a currency. It is a combination of all these things. In order to properly understand this fusion called bitcoin new metrics and analysis are necessary. To take control over bitcoin and grow confident you must know 2 concepts:

Creation Cost - The amount that is costs to make a bitcoin.

• This cost represents the lowest price that bitcoin can functionally go.

• It represents the combined investment of all the businesses that are active in bitcoin.

• The creators of bitcoin will support this price as they did from Dec 2018 to March 2019. They will not give up their golden goose.

• This price can change minute by minute because it is based on the hash rate of the network (the amount of active servers) and the efficiency of the machines that are active.

Cash flow - The amount of longterm investment needed to maintain the current price.

• 1800 bitcoin are created every day

• If the price of bitcoin is $13,800 it costs $24.8 million of long term investment to maintain that price.

• This is why bitcoin goes up very fast, and slowly drains back down.

• This is why the 19k bitcoin of Dec 2017 didn’t stay. It was impossible to maintain, so it drained back down because $34.2 million of longterm investment is not feasible.

Bitcoin operates like an unregulated, manipulated commodity. The only way to profit from it (and not get rekt) is to understand how it works and take advantage of prime opportunities to buy and sell. It is not difficult, in fact, it is quite simple.

In hind sight we all know that it was a good to sell at $19k and $13.8k as well as buy at $3.2k last December. Wouldn’t you have liked to know this information during those times?

If you'd like request some analysis or research from me here:

https://www.amsinger.org

Much love and hard work,


Aaron

I am really missing some of your calculations here.
How do you calculate that it costs 24.8m if it costs 13k? What is the calculation behind this metrics? Because it seems like you are using a long term period that I am not getting.

[Herbert2020]

I am not a newcomer, you have no clue how hash rate works. You have no clue how difficulty works. If you "assessment" was correct then the week that btc was up 40% the hash rate would have followed 40% up in a week. You have used no data. You have used no actual bitcoin infrastructure (ASICs). You are a manipulator.

you are a newcomer otherwise you wouldn't have made such ridiculous claims.
hashrate rises when new miners enter the space, it requires them to either already have ASICs and turn them on or go buy some and start using them to mine bitcoin. that takes time so you can't expect hashrate to just jump each time bitcoin price jumps! it will slowly rise right after the price rise. and if you look at the hashrate charts versus the price you could clearly see that!

it is interesting that everyone is disapproving your whole speculation and yet you are hostile towards everyone and at the same time want to sell your services!!!

[Harlot]

Love how you introduced or promote your service to analyze Bitcoin but I really don't buy it. The OP talks Bitcoin more of its economical side rather than talk about its technical side which already gives me a hint that you will just talk about demand and supply when they avail your services. Talking about demand and supply is the most inaccurate way to forecast the price of Bitcoin specially when its a volatile asset compared to others no one really knows the exact target price for it as things could easily shift with just one FOMO or FUD.

[cocoadreamboy]

Bitcoin is not a stock, an annuity, a simple commodity, or a currency. It is a combination of all these things. In order to properly understand this fusion called bitcoin new metrics and analysis are necessary. To take control over bitcoin and grow confident you must know 2 concepts:

Creation Cost - The amount that is costs to make a bitcoin.

• This cost represents the lowest price that bitcoin can functionally go.

• It represents the combined investment of all the businesses that are active in bitcoin.

• The creators of bitcoin will support this price as they did from Dec 2018 to March 2019. They will not give up their golden goose.

• This price can change minute by minute because it is based on the hash rate of the network (the amount of active servers) and the efficiency of the machines that are active.

Cash flow - The amount of longterm investment needed to maintain the current price.

• 1800 bitcoin are created every day

• If the price of bitcoin is $13,800 it costs $24.8 million of long term investment to maintain that price.

• This is why bitcoin goes up very fast, and slowly drains back down.

• This is why the 19k bitcoin of Dec 2017 didn’t stay. It was impossible to maintain, so it drained back down because $34.2 million of longterm investment is not feasible.

Bitcoin operates like an unregulated, manipulated commodity. The only way to profit from it (and not get rekt) is to understand how it works and take advantage of prime opportunities to buy and sell. It is not difficult, in fact, it is quite simple.

In hind sight we all know that it was a good to sell at $19k and $13.8k as well as buy at $3.2k last December. Wouldn’t you have liked to know this information during those times?

If you'd like request some analysis or research from me here:

https://www.amsinger.org

Much love and hard work,


Aaron

I am really missing some of your calculations here.
How do you calculate that it costs 24.8m if it costs 13k? What is the calculation behind this metrics? Because it seems like you are using a long term period that I am not getting.

1800 X $13k = 24.8 million per day

[cocoadreamboy]

you are a newcomer otherwise you wouldn't have made such ridiculous claims.
hashrate rises when new miners enter the space, it requires them to either already have ASICs and turn them on or go buy some and start using them to mine bitcoin. that takes time so you can't expect hashrate to just jump each time bitcoin price jumps! it will slowly rise right after the price rise. and if you look at the hashrate charts versus the price you could clearly see that!

it is interesting that everyone is disapproving your whole speculation and yet you are hostile towards everyone and at the same time want to sell your services!!!

I really just practice on here. My main marketing focus is Linkedin. You are simply a manipulator who wants people to buy buy buy to add liquidity to the market. You don't care if they get screwed or lose 40% of their principal. You just want people to buy buy buy. Anyone who speaks of logic and numbers is your natural enemy.

https://www.amsinger.org

Aaron

[1Referee]

complete and total fantasy. you can't stop sellers from selling. and miners will dump 1800/day bitcoins so unless bitcoin is absorbing more than $30million per day it is not sustainable.

It's true that you can't stop sellers from selling, but it's not true that miners will or are dumping 1800 coins every day. If you doubt this, then go check the mining addresses and you'll see that only a smaller fraction of these coins are actually sent over to an exchange. Bitcoin's transparency is wonderful, which means that you don't have to trust on my anyone's information, but can check for yourself.

If miners would really dump all their mining rewards every day, the price would have gone back to $6000 again by now, or even lower. In the end, miners are incentivized to not hurt the price too much by selling, otherwise their operations will suffer too.

[cocoadreamboy]

It's true that you can't stop sellers from selling, but it's not true that miners will or are dumping 1800 coins every day. If you doubt this, then go check the mining addresses and you'll see that only a smaller fraction of these coins are actually sent over to an exchange. Bitcoin's transparency is wonderful, which means that you don't have to trust on my anyone's information, but can check for yourself.

If miners would really dump all their mining rewards every day, the price would have gone back to $6000 again by now, or even lower. In the end, miners are incentivized to not hurt the price too much by selling, otherwise their operations will suffer too.

Where are the mining addresses you are speaking of? If you want to promote an idea please bring your facts and data.

They need to sell to pay for their expenses. That is business. You are arguing that car companies will warehouse EVERY car they make just to keep the supply of available cars down, so the price stays high. Complete illogical thought.

https://www.amsinger.org

Aaron

[gentlemand]

Mining function on its algorithm, but there needs to be investment expecting return.

Um, yeah. That's what the difficulty adjustment does. It's a never ending arbiter that pushes out unprofitable miners and allows others to take their place. And it works to absolute perfection.

I've lost count of the number of times people have rolled out the 'mining death spiral' shit. It's junk spouted by people who can't be bothered to spend a few seconds reading. I will never care about mining. I do not need to.

[figmentofmyass]

Where are the mining addresses you are speaking of? If you want to promote an idea please bring your facts and data.

look at every mined block and see where the coinbase rewards go. if an output doesn't move, it's not being sold. in truth, since you are the one asserting that 1800 mined coins/day are being sold, the burden of proof is on you to show that.

They need to sell to pay for their expenses. That is business.

yes but on what timeline? you're not accounting for the fact that miners are collectively investing billions of dollars into their operations. the largest miners are well capitalized with no need to dump BTC to cover their day-to-day costs. they are not investing in mining at the current cost so they can immediately sell their coins for a very marginal profit (or loss). they sell as little as possible to cover overheads while holding the majority for much higher prices.

it would be irrational for miners to bother building capitalized operations only to dump 100% of their investment for extremely marginal returns. they would be better off running laundromats or supermarkets for such low returns. mining is a high risk/high reward venture but you assume that miners are treating it like a high risk/low reward venture. it makes zero sense.

[cocoadreamboy]

Where are the mining addresses you are speaking of? If you want to promote an idea please bring your facts and data.

look at every mined block and see where the coinbase rewards go. if an output doesn't move, it's not being sold. in truth, since you are the one asserting that 1800 mined coins/day are being sold, the burden of proof is on you to show that.

They need to sell to pay for their expenses. That is business.

yes but on what timeline? you're not accounting for the fact that miners are collectively investing billions of dollars into their operations. the largest miners are well capitalized with no need to dump BTC to cover their day-to-day costs. they are not investing in mining at the current cost so they can immediately sell their coins for a very marginal profit (or loss). they sell as little as possible to cover overheads while holding the majority for much higher prices.

it would be irrational for miners to bother building capitalized operations only to dump 100% of their investment for extremely marginal returns. they would be better off running laundromats or supermarkets for such low returns. mining is a high risk/high reward venture but you assume that miners are treating it like a high risk/low reward venture. it makes zero sense.

Miner investment isn't in bitcoin. It is in mining bitcoin. To them bitcoin is the product not the investment.

That guy brought up the wallet addresses so I asked him to clarify. I hardly think that is not fair.

I am not saying 1800 bitcoin that were mined today will be sold, but if there is constant pressure of 1800 bitcoin per day some of the 1800 mined a week ago, or a month ago, or a year ago will be sold. Bitcoin has been going for a long time, and every coin in use has been mined. If you wish to ignore the fact that 1800 btc are mined per day that is your business. No one makes a product in order to not sell it especially if it costs millions of dollars of electricity to make.

You need to know this information if you want to protect yourself from losses.

https://www.amsinger.org

Aaron

[1Referee]

Where are the mining addresses you are speaking of? If you want to promote an idea please bring your facts and data.

look at every mined block and see where the coinbase rewards go. if an output doesn't move, it's not being sold. in truth, since you are the one asserting that 1800 mined coins/day are being sold, the burden of proof is on you to show that.

That. It's quite funny how he claims to know that miners are selling 1800 coins per day, but doesn't know where to look in order to actually find out what miners are doing with their coins. One would think that it isn't necessary to spoon feed someone that 'knowledgeable'. 

Another important aspect to mining is that in times of uncertainty, miners use platforms such as Bitmex to hedge a potential drop. In this case it's purely done to preserve as much of their fiat value as possible, but without the coins actually touching a spot exchange. Miners are hodlers for the most part, not sellers.

[figmentofmyass]

Miner investment isn't in bitcoin. It is in mining bitcoin. To them bitcoin is the product not the investment.

no, this is what you fundamentally don't understand. if miners were interested in producing goods to sell on the market, they'd invest in widget factories, not bitcoin mines. bitcoin mining is extremely risky---it makes no sense to sell mined bitcoins for marginal gains. you are treating it like a low risk manufacturing business.

mining is the original form of bitcoin investment. those with access to cheap ASIC fabrication and cheap electricity at scale pursue mining operations because it will outperform simply buying bitcoins on the market. it's an arms race among the top miners to hoard from a very small supply. and they are fully intent on withholding coins from the market to drive prices higher.

I am not saying 1800 bitcoin that were mined today will be sold, but if there is constant pressure of 1800 bitcoin per day some of the 1800 mined a week ago, or a month ago, or a year ago will be sold.

bitcoins that were mined at much, much lower costs than current prices. if price spent a prolonged period below miner costs, you would be right, and there would be massive pressure to sell. and that's what the 2014 market looked like. but that's not the current situation at all---look at the chart. most miners for the past half year are sitting on massive paper profits and only need to sell a small fraction to cover their operational expenses.

as long as bitcoin retains its bullish trend (see the monthly chart) then miners will keep withholding coins from the market.

[cocoadreamboy]

I don't understand why people have such a visceral response to the idea that bitcoin miners want to make actual money, and care about profit margins and regular business views. Understanding bitcoin financially is the only way to identify prime times to buy such as in February this year, and prime times to sell such as on June 26. Without looking at the miners as people who just want to hold bitcoins, the market actually makes SENSE.

https://www.amsinger.org

Check it out on my site I explain everything there,

Aaron