Newbies: The top 40 greatest Wet Farts on this forum: Avoid serious discussions

[Singlebyte]

-I have a better challenge-

Please try to find anyone with an activity rating of less than 100 that actual contributes in a positive and productive way to BitcoinTalk forum.  Nominees will be void if any of the following have incurred:

1. 4 words or less posted in thread
2. Incomplete sentences
3. Badgering or harassing other members
4. Trolling
5. Posting in wrong sections
6. Scamming
7. Spreading FUD or outright inaccuracies
8. Wining about things like forum layout/structure/features/policies
9. Are annoying


Please post all credible recommendations below and we will have a vote later on!


Additional recommendations to add to the list are appreciated

[hyunsookmom]

-I have a better challenge-

Please try to find anyone with an activity rating of less than 100 that actual contributes in a positive and productive way to BitcoinTalk forum.  Nominees will be void if any of the following have incurred:

1. 4 words or less posted in thread
2. Incomplete sentences
3. Badgering or harassing other members
4. Trolling
5. Posting in wrong sections
6. Scamming
7. Spreading FUD or outright inaccuracies
8. Wining about things like forum layout/structure/features/policies
9. Are annoying


Please post all credible recommendations below and we will have a vote later on!


Additional recommendations to add to the list are appreciated

9. Are annoying

I vote for you...

[Lethn]

You seriously could just add the majority of people on my ignore list and I think people would probably agree with me. To their credit I think a couple of them have calmed down since but the most recent dicks have been Bobsurplus and otrkid70 for their part in the infamous nigger thread Phinneus posted, but I don't vote for them based on just that thread because it was a general trollfest anyway. What made them deserving of nomination was when they actually were stupid enough to take it all seriously and started going around harassing any members that defended themselves against their accusations and harassment. Not only that a vaguely amusing part of it was the way they circle jerked each other because I think just about everybody at that point had put them on the ignore list since they were on auto-moron mode and wouldn't even read other peoples' posts.

Not only did they suck at what they do, they resorted to extremely petty methods to get peoples attention and what was most insane was how they had convinced themselves they were completely in the right for doing it and began to throw accusations at moderating staff for not giving in to their demands, it takes a certain level of stupid to act that self-righteous and arrogant. I hope it was a troll attempt because then I might have a bit of respect for them, but unfortunately I know in the real world people really are that stupid, oh and it may well be that since nobody was paying attention to him at first otrkid70 and Bobsurplus might be the same person, it's only a possibility though.

[Singlebyte]

-I have a better challenge-

Please try to find anyone with an activity rating of less than 100 that actual contributes in a positive and productive way to BitcoinTalk forum.  Nominees will be void if any of the following have incurred:

1. 4 words or less posted in thread
2. Incomplete sentences
3. Badgering or harassing other members
4. Trolling
5. Posting in wrong sections
6. Scamming
7. Spreading FUD or outright inaccuracies
8. Wining about things like forum layout/structure/features/policies
9. Are annoying


Please post all credible recommendations below and we will have a vote later on!


Additional recommendations to add to the list are appreciated

9. Are annoying

I vote for you...

Thank you for nominating me for "contributing in a positive and productive way to BitcoinTalk forum."  Unfortunately I have passed the 100 activity level and will be unable to accept the nomination.  However, since you are still under the 100 limit I thought about nominating you.  Unfortunately you were rejected because you violated 1-4 and number 9.    Sorry, but there will not be any further contest for the 2014 year.  Please check back in 2015 for new and upcoming events!

[hyunsookmom]

-I have a better challenge-

Please try to find anyone with an activity rating of less than 100 that actual contributes in a positive and productive way to BitcoinTalk forum.  Nominees will be void if any of the following have incurred:

1. 4 words or less posted in thread
2. Incomplete sentences
3. Badgering or harassing other members
4. Trolling
5. Posting in wrong sections
6. Scamming
7. Spreading FUD or outright inaccuracies
8. Wining about things like forum layout/structure/features/policies
9. Are annoying


Please post all credible recommendations below and we will have a vote later on!


Additional recommendations to add to the list are appreciated

9. Are annoying

I vote for you...

Thank you for nominating me for "contributing in a positive and productive way to BitcoinTalk forum."  Unfortunately I have passed the 100 activity level and will be unable to accept the nomination.  However, since you are still under the 100 limit I thought about nominating you.  Unfortunately you were rejected because you violated 1-4 and number 9.    Sorry, but there will not be any further contest for the 2014 year.  Please check back in 2015 for new and upcoming events!

You think highlighting others faults rather than your own is positive? Oddball.