Should participants by tagged if BM tagged?

[tvplus006]

...
If participants consciously go to work in the same campaign with a fraudster (to advertise a service that is probably also fraudulent) then should participants be tagged?

When it is proved that a new project is fraud and will be announced in the thread of the bounty, all new participants and those who continue to participate in the bounty should receive a negative tag.

Who should announce that a project is a scam?
Scams are not moderated in the forum. Any announcement regarding a scam is not official.

Look at this as a sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184340.msg53109889#msg53109889

[The Sceptical Chymist]

First question is tagged for what ?

Exactly, that's the question that should be asked.  If a bounty manager has been tagged because he continued to run a bounty for a scam project, that would be one thing.  If he got tagged for account selling or something unrelated to the bounty that members are participating in, that's another story.

But in general, I don't think bounty hunters ought to get red-trusted just because the manager is.  That's basically guilt by association, which I'm not a fan of, nor have I tagged bounty hunters because of being in a situation like this.  You have to weigh the circumstances individually for each case, not just tag people across the board because things smell fishy.

[hosseinimr93]

...
If participants consciously go to work in the same campaign with a fraudster (to advertise a service that is probably also fraudulent) then should participants be tagged?

When it is proved that a new project is fraud and will be announced in the thread of the bounty, all new participants and those who continue to participate in the bounty should receive a negative tag.

Who should announce that a project is a scam?
Scams are not moderated in the forum. Any announcement regarding a scam is not official.

Look at this as a sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184340.msg53109889#msg53109889

Members of the forum have the right to give any other user negative or positive trust. It's their right and no one can force them to change their mind.
You can give negative trust to anyone you think is a scammer and anyone promoting a project you think is scammer. It's your right.
But in my opinion, generally it's not a good idea. It is never officially announced that a project is scam.
Assume that you believe that a project is a scam and I don't agree with you. What should I do? I don't know whether I should participate in that campaign or not. On the one hand, I don't think the project is a scam. On the other hand, I'm afraid I get negative trust from you.

Anyway, As I said, members of the forum have the right to give negative trust to any other user that they think are harmful to the forum.

[cutesgirl]

Not yet because they are not trust any more for running project and waste your time and your working without get reward at the end campaign, I have seen many bounty campaign manager got red trust and they not become recommendation bounty manager for participating because they have experience with scammer bounty hunter before and they got red trust account.