The Current ICO Project Looks a Little & Is Different From Previous Years?

[btc_angela]

Is it only me, who feels that the ICO project for slots (signature campaign) in 2020 looks a little?
I see more slots for (social media campaigns) compared to (signature campaigns).

Signature campaigns for bounties are no longer effective for projects. They attracted so much heat in this community that's why they targeted social media campaigns more. But if you would see projects using sig campaigns to promote, there are less percentage as compare to other mediums of promotion. Maybe they also know the usual sig campaign spams happening here the can reflect negatively on them.

[bluebit25]

Is it only me, who feels that the ICO project for slots (signature campaign) in 2020 looks a little?
I see more slots for (social media campaigns) compared to (signature campaigns).

Signature campaigns for bounties are no longer effective for projects. They attracted so much heat in this community that's why they targeted social media campaigns more. But if you would see projects using sig campaigns to promote, there are less percentage as compare to other mediums of promotion. Maybe they also know the usual sig campaign spams happening here the can reflect negatively on them.

For bounty, I think the signature campaign is the most effective for new projects. Social campaigns are now just bots and fake accounts, so new projects won't be marketable to investors. In my opinion the real reason why the signature campaign is limited is because this campaign requires a high budget to be able to perform.

[serjent05]

Is it only me, who feels that the ICO project for slots (signature campaign) in 2020 looks a little?
I see more slots for (social media campaigns) compared to (signature campaigns).

I want to participate in the bounty project (Signature Campaign), can someone recommend a good project to follow now?
I will reconsider your reference.
#Thank you

It is kinda hard to recommend any altcoin signature bounty today because of several factors.

1.  Several bounty campaigns scamming their bounty participants.
2.  Lots of projects ended unsuccessfully paying bounty participants worthless token
3.  Lots of projects are milking the Bounty participants of their identity and sell it to other company
4.  Swapping token rewards to new token requiring KYC so that they can deprived these participants of their rewards, one good example is SWACE.

and it makes me feel bad to see those people whom I recommend the campaign suffers such experience.

And probably the reduced percentage on signature campaign shows that the impact of it to the project is diminishing.

[Kupid002]

Is it only me, who feels that the ICO project for slots (signature campaign) in 2020 looks a little?
I see more slots for (social media campaigns) compared to (signature campaigns).

Signature campaigns for bounties are no longer effective for projects. They attracted so much heat in this community that's why they targeted social media campaigns more. But if you would see projects using sig campaigns to promote, there are less percentage as compare to other mediums of promotion. Maybe they also know the usual sig campaign spams happening here the can reflect negatively on them.

For bounty, I think the signature campaign is the most effective for new projects. Social campaigns are now just bots and fake accounts, so new projects won't be marketable to investors. In my opinion the real reason why the signature campaign is limited is because this campaign requires a high budget to be able to perform.

no they dont really need a budget for bounty rewards if they need it its from other payment that they need to pay like hiring people who will manage or thier community manager and even listing.
 they are the one needed to have budget because all of them need to be paid in fiat unlike bounty participants.

[chennappa121]

Is it only me, who feels that the ICO project for slots (signature campaign) in 2020 looks a little?
I see more slots for (social media campaigns) compared to (signature campaigns).

Signature campaigns for bounties are no longer effective for projects. They attracted so much heat in this community that's why they targeted social media campaigns more. But if you would see projects using sig campaigns to promote, there are less percentage as compare to other mediums of promotion. Maybe they also know the usual sig campaign spams happening here the can reflect negatively on them.

For bounty, I think the signature campaign is the most effective for new projects. Social campaigns are now just bots and fake accounts, so new projects won't be marketable to investors. In my opinion the real reason why the signature campaign is limited is because this campaign requires a high budget to be able to perform.

I think social media campaigns will be more effective than any other campaigns because we know how people crazy to using social media nowadays. so it will be helpful to reach all over the world within short time. and the social media campaign budget will be high compare to other campaign.

[matchi2011]

Is it only me, who feels that the ICO project for slots (signature campaign) in 2020 looks a little?
I see more slots for (social media campaigns) compared to (signature campaigns).

Signature campaigns for bounties are no longer effective for projects. They attracted so much heat in this community that's why they targeted social media campaigns more. But if you would see projects using sig campaigns to promote, there are less percentage as compare to other mediums of promotion. Maybe they also know the usual sig campaign spams happening here the can reflect negatively on them.

They can have much promotions using social medias and other forms of bounties then pay much lesser instead of giving signature campaigns where the target audience is smaller than those social media where they can attract new investors.
Most of the developers are aiming to attract more people they see the bigger pictures outside this forum.

[TrevorS]

Is it only me, who feels that the ICO project for slots (signature campaign) in 2020 looks a little?
I see more slots for (social media campaigns) compared to (signature campaigns).

Signature campaigns for bounties are no longer effective for projects. They attracted so much heat in this community that's why they targeted social media campaigns more. But if you would see projects using sig campaigns to promote, there are less percentage as compare to other mediums of promotion. Maybe they also know the usual sig campaign spams happening here the can reflect negatively on them.

They can have much promotions using social medias and other forms of bounties then pay much lesser instead of giving signature campaigns where the target audience is smaller than those social media where they can attract new investors.
Most of the developers are aiming to attract more people they see the bigger pictures outside this forum.

You're right. Signing a company is much more profitable for those who already have a ready-made business and have a finished product.
In this way, they can attract new people as customers. However, it will be quite difficult to find new investors through the company of signatures on the forum.

On the other hand, you can spend not so much money on a company of signatures by cutting down payments, for example, to $ 30-10 a week, this will be enough for a large number of people to join the company.

[spike420211]

Do you want to say that in 2019 there were a lot of good projects? Of course they were, but they were extremely few.
In addition, I do not remember that in January, something really worthwhile was observed in the Bounty market.
Maybe it's worth the wait and something will appear, or perhaps, as previously assumed, the bounty market is starting to fade.
Indeed, in essence, the Bounty is an advertisement, but now no one wants to invest in new projects, which means that no one will pay for this advertisement either.

[Latviand]

Maybe, things are different when it comes to the market situation rather than in bounty campaigns. Before, when the market situation was in favor to us, or when the market prices of cryptos are that high, bounty campaigns are really profitable. Many bounty participants have earned huge profit from doing campaigns which is totally unlike at this moment that only few projects are succeeding and the profit is small more often.

Is it only me, who feels that the ICO project for slots (signature campaign) in 2020 looks a little?
I see more slots for (social media campaigns) compared to (signature campaigns).

Signature campaigns for bounties are no longer effective for projects. They attracted so much heat in this community that's why they targeted social media campaigns more. But if you would see projects using sig campaigns to promote, there are less percentage as compare to other mediums of promotion. Maybe they also know the usual sig campaign spams happening here the can reflect negatively on them.

They can have much promotions using social medias and other forms of bounties then pay much lesser instead of giving signature campaigns where the target audience is smaller than those social media where they can attract new investors.
Most of the developers are aiming to attract more people they see the bigger pictures outside this forum.

Maybe that is because the target population is more suitable in this medium than to just any people in social media. Indeed, more people are in social media but not all people would be representative sample. I mean, not all people in social media are not inclined to crypto projects which wouls make the number of people there, smaller than in this medium where most of the people are into cryptos, making the people of interest more. Think of this: selling boxing gloves to fishermen. Do you think they would patronize the gloves? The answer is obvious and that is the reason why promoting a project is more often made in this forum.