Waiting for DT- A completely abuse of merit

[alamin173020]

A completely merit abuse. I'm reporting this profile cause I am seeing that this person gave an standard amount of merit to one person.Which make me think this as a completely abuse of merit and I think the  accounts are belong to same person.
So, I think this report will attract the DT/Moderators and will take action against them.

Merit summary :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=553238


Merit receiver : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553575

[jackg]

The posts being deleted looks quite shady, also you're probably better off moving this to meta through the "move topic" link in the bottom left.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

The two accounts in question:  oceanriver and skysblu.  Not saying that it's great evidence that they're connected but it totally looks like the typical account farmer who can't come up with dissimilar names for all of his accounts.  

But aside from the usernames, it does look like there was some merit-swapping going on--but OP, I don't think anybody is going to tag those accounts.  Merit abusers have to be exceptionally bold and blatant before they're negged by DT members, and I'm not sure this case rises to those standards.  But I'm only one person with an opinion, so who knows.

The posts being deleted looks quite shady, also you're probably better off moving this to meta through the "move topic" link in the bottom left.

Maybe it would be better suited for Reputation.

[Baofeng]

And what makes is questionable is that both accounts suddenly woke up. Clearly there is a merit abuse here, but I' not sure if DT members are going to tag the accounts.

[leyton11]

Wow, maybe the cheaters have discovered your post and they have deleted all the posts. I also suspect that all accounts are controlled by one person and all participate in the yobit signature campaign. perhaps you should turn this article into Meta or you can contact moderators here directly for a solution. really quite disappointing that the acc sales took place so easily and the DT was too indifferent to it. they need to be more rigorous during the process.

[acroman08]

the accounts have already been reported by hosseinimr93 on Reputation (link: Abusing merit system and Yobit campaign. and yahoo have banned all the account in question from yobit campaign all that is left is tagging the accounts but I am not sure if that is tag worthy.

Wow, maybe the cheaters have discovered your post and they have deleted all the posts.

they have deleted their merited post way before this thread is created to try and hide their tracks but epically failed

[TECSHARE]

The two accounts in question:  oceanriver and skysblu.  Not saying that it's great evidence that they're connected but it totally looks like the typical account farmer who can't come up with dissimilar names for all of his accounts.  

But aside from the usernames, it does look like there was some merit-swapping going on--but OP, I don't think anybody is going to tag those accounts.  Merit abusers have to be exceptionally bold and blatant before they're negged by DT members, and I'm not sure this case rises to those standards.  But I'm only one person with an opinion, so who knows.

The posts being deleted looks quite shady, also you're probably better off moving this to meta through the "move topic" link in the bottom left.

Maybe it would be better suited for Reputation.

People shouldn't be tagging for merit abuse anyway. That is a forum issue and should be reported to mods.

[The Cryptovator]

This topic has been discussing on other thread, these abuser already reported. Please take a look and be more active on reputation. Here is it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219208.0

I had not replied there because admin is quite soft about merit issue. But to be honest that was merit abuse and my mind just forcing to tag them. But by considering admin thoughts just ignoring such as abuse.

If they complain about amounts, tell them to complain to me. It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down.

If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer.

Although above quote was about merit source but it proved that admin isn't too strict about merit abuse, if incase there is not merit buy/sell case.

[yahoo62278]

This topic has been discussing on other thread, these abuser already reported. Please take a look and be more active on reputation. Here is it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219208.0

I had not replied there because admin is quite soft about merit issue. But to be honest that was merit abuse and my mind just forcing to tag them. But by considering admin thoughts just ignoring such as abuse.

If they complain about amounts, tell them to complain to me. It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down.

If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer.

Although above quote was about merit source but it proved that admin isn't too strict about merit abuse, if incase there is not merit buy/sell case.

Kinda off topic here but since this topic was opened yesterday by another user I kinda feel like the OP read the topic and opened a discussion elsewhere in Hope's of getting merited himself.

OP you really should use the search function on the forum before opening duplicate topics.