Thanks for providing the unedited posts, that OP changed for for some reason..
So, it seems that Zulfi125 and ali115112 might be alts of previously banned accounts, and therefore should be banned (haven't check that claim properly yet), but i am not so sure that @pankaj1234 used their video . From what i can see in the spreadsheet link provided by OP, @pankaj1234 allegedly used this IQ address
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2F9FMQh3y5%2Fpankajscam.png&t=665&c=ztoMBE-bozg2VA)
Problem with this is that it doesn't match the address used in proof of registration post and not even the account name.
- Campaigns applied for: Facebook, Telegram, YouTube
- IQ Wallet address: QUTL9NDLhdDRZSiUhegnfqejjSxgho7qe5
Pankaj1234 indeed joined YouTube campaign, but in comment /like part of the campaign not video creation, as it can be seen from that spreadsheet, where he used same address as in proof of authentication post.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2FFKGbCdcX%2Fpankaj2.png&t=665&c=liiH5zmp8pT3UQ)
Same address is used for Telegram and Facebook part of the campaign (this is telegram ss)
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2FbNWqb3FK%2Fpankaj3.png&t=665&c=VxOuLiYeMzf9uQ)
As we've seen before, it is not unusual that bounty scammers use other members info and work, trying to fool less experienced/lazy bounty managers. This might be the case here as well.