i do my research.
you just spam links of people that make theories
i have debunked many things that del bigtree has theorised
..
but with that said. i get it
you spend a few months fangirling over Lentz. and now your fangirling over Bigtree. i get it you want everyone to know our a fan.
we all understand that.
you can spend months showing off your fangirl skills but your still missing the point about actually doing actual research and providing actual insight to the REALITY of the situation.
so do yourself one favour
instead of just fangirling Bigtree.. how about you "take notes, and find the truth"
in otherwords scrutinise and take notes of his video.. and then find the truth from other SOURCES
dont just blindly class bigtree as reporting the truth. without you bothering to take notes and find out the truth by researching beyond his words
i have told you this advice many times in many topics. can you just for once not pretend to have dementia and just try to want to actually find the real truth
here ill give you an example of how taking notes and finding the truth actually works
using the video 'is social distancing working' [featuring a mathematician called knut]
0:00-0:30 notes:- knut complains about why mathematicians were not involved.
fact checking: mathematicians were involved and they done math on what the r0 is and also models of spread of that r0
fact checking: seems knut just angry he personally was not invited
0:30-1:00 notes:- displays knuts credentials.
fact checking: 'former' this 'former' that. ok so his successor. the current this and that was involved. .. thus double backs up that i feel he is just angry he was not personally invited. obviously because he is not in that role.
1:00-1:30 notes:- opinion there is no math consensus because knut was not re-hired back to former role.
fact checking: yet the current guy doing the roles knut did do was involved. shame bigtree didnt check that
1:30-2:00 notes:- introduces knut. hyping him up
2:00-2:30 notes:-knut says 'we shouldnt deal with covid19. just let it happen
(facepalm) il explain at later fact check
2:30-2:45 notes:- 'only isolate vulnerable and all be over in 4 weeks
fact checking: first of all as a mathematician he should know that the r0 of 2.6 is not a 7bill population coverage of 4 weeks. but a population coverage of atleast 6-12 months. where the first 4 weeks are low numbers and the final 4 weeks months later are huge numbers. its called exponential growth that even a mathematician should know
he should also know that the % of vulnerable that would need healthcare far outpaces bed capacity in hospital
yep thats math. something he has not alluded too
2:45-3:00 notes:- 'no evidence that isolation has made any effect on the epidemic'
fact checking: yet reports from all countries show that although 90%+ have not got it due to self isolation (first effect) the self isolating/distancing has actually reduced the r0
again its called maths
and now you can understand my initial facepalm
even in knuts tone. by using 'anti-social separation, prohibition, draconian' is showing he is very bias and his mind is not about human care/welfare of risk of a virus. because someone that cares about the math and the precautions would use things like 'prevention, safety, isolation'
but i am still laughing that bigtree invites an EX math guy who didnt get his job back. to be interviewed and in the interview is denying the math and even getting the math he is suggesting wrong
so badecker next time dont just watch and admire. instead take your own advice 'take notes and find the truth'
I probably won't take the time to go and look at what you are saying, just to verify it. However, even if you are right in about mistakes being made, people make mistakes all the time. To prove this, one only need look at your post I am quoting here, to see YOUR mistake.
What's your mistake? Your mistake is to focus on me rather than on the fake-news that is causing a real pandemic. The pandemic is totally unnecessary. But you like the pandemic, so you take the focus off this fact.
You probably have realized that CV doesn't generally hit people under 60. And even people over 60 who have had only one flu shot might be strengthened.
But the biggest thing you are trying to hide is, it is the flu shots over the years that have weakened the immune systems of people (especially the elderly), so that they are more easily affected by Covid-19. In fact, you probably know that flu shots over the years are what has set the people up to be affected by the Covid-19 activator, and that it is the stuff injected by the flu shots over the years that is causing the illness among the people.
By the way you write, I could easily see how you might be one of the creators of the stuff in the flu shots that is being activated by Covid-19, just so that there is a little bit of an illness excuse to call for a pandemic. In other words, you are probably one of the people behind creating this pandemic.
In the end, you will pay for it.
