Suggestion to reduce MegaSpam threads .

[crwth]

Personally, when one of my topics has received plenty of replies, it's enough IMO, and I close it and post last on that specific topic telling others that I'm going to close it. I think it's good practice wherever you may be, not just here in BTCT but in other forums as well. The best thing for members is to report threads, just like what others posted here and know from your POV if it's worthy or spammy, etc.

A great goal for reporting is to unlock the "Your report history" when you press the report to the moderator and see if you have good quality etc.

[TGD]

Most of this MegaSpam thread can be found on Bitcoin Discussion or Gambling Discussion. In reality, It's impossible to halt all new post coming to the thread that asking for an opinion about a certain topic because there is many possible explanation on each topic and most the time, User will not gonna read all previous post.

Example:

What's your favorite crypto for gambling?

If bitcoin doesn't reach $500K in 3 years....

Reporting them 1 by 1 was really hard. It will be better if all Signature Campaign(Including Signature Bounty) in the forum will have a General Rule about NOT accepting post in general thread. Most of spam poster are participating in campaigns. It will be easier to cut them from the source of income.

[friends1980]

Reporting them 1 by 1 was really hard. It will be better if all Signature Campaign(Including Signature Bounty) in the forum will have a General Rule about NOT accepting post in general thread. Most of spam poster are participating in campaigns. It will be easier to cut them from the source of income.

I've suggested years ago that campaign managers should be responsible for cleaning up spam / actively searching spammers and kicking them out of the campaigns, maybe leave negative trust etc. Looked like I wasn't the only one who liked this suggestion.

Now I'm not going to bump my own old thread, but maybe it would help if the idea got more support.

[Harlot]

I don't know if I suggested this before or not but I think the best way to avoid spam threads is having some kind of automation when it comes to locking a thread. Like when the first 2 or 3 pages the OP of the thread hasn't replied to his own topic then the thread will automatically be locked.

The idea is not bad. But who will do this? Also even though OP is not replying anymore on his own topic, what if there are people engaging on the discussion/interested on the idea he started would that be still considered as spam?

That's one point I have missed out and you are right if people are engaged more than the OP on his own topic I think they should continue to discuss it but in this way where even the OP cannot moderate his own thread and his topic is somehow generic then there is a high chance it can be a spam thread with only members parroting the same responses. If we can somehow have a voting system where 3 or 4 people have answered the same response in a page or two then it is eligible to be locked to avoid it being a spam thread.

[cryptoaddictchie]

That's one point I have missed out and you are right if people are engaged more than the OP on his own topic I think they should continue to discuss it but in this way where even the OP cannot moderate his own thread and his topic is somehow generic then there is a high chance it can be a spam thread with only members parroting the same responses.

If something came to that point then the best solution is report all those new posted that considered spam. If the topic is already left by the author then we cant do anything about it. But we can report that if the topic he opens is likely a generic one. Like >>> Report To Moderator = Topic has been spammed advised locked.

If we can somehow have a voting system where 3 or 4 people have answered the same response in a page or two then it is eligible to be locked to avoid it being a spam thread.

No need I guess. Just report it, cause the thread becomes a spam hub already. Im sure moderator will noticed that especially if the pages are above 50 to 100 pages already.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

But isn't this a platform meant for continues discussion? There are some or specific topic that are meant to be left open because irrespective of the pages of the thread, the discussion ongoing aren't usually a repeated one. Also in prevention of having repeated or similar thread created, the open thread will serve as a reminder that there's a topic currently active on the same topic.

I'm not in support of an automated system or a voting criteria to lock topics, as those can be easily abused by attackers using their alts or close friends to attack your topic. The way the forum is been manually moderated is ok by me, as it goes to prove before you get any punishment, your account must have been reviewed by a human and not this annoying bots we have this days.

It gets annoying getting locked out of my twitter account almost weekly, I won't want to have same experience in the forum with my topics getting locked.

[o_e_l_e_o]

• Report spam response on megathread or the thread itself if its a low substantial topic
• OP should always used self moderation feature to avoid spammers and be responsible to lock it if your finished with it
• Avoid posts that have generic topics( if not today later it will be locked or deleted)

• Agree, but if a thread is of a low value or insubstantial topic ("When moon?" springs to mind), you don't have to wait for it to become a spam megathread before reporting it
• Unfortunately, this is never going to happen. Even senior members don't moderate their threads and leave them unlocked to fill with spam.
• Again, unfortunately, never going to happen. As long as there are bounties there will be bounty spammers filling up low value threads.

I've suggested years ago that campaign managers should be responsible for cleaning up spam / actively searching spammers and kicking them out of the campaigns

We already have Signature Campaign Guidelines which state spammers will receive escalating bans, and managers and companies will be held responsible for members who spam. Unfortunately, these guidelines are widely ignored and not enforced.

There are some or specific topic that are meant to be left open because irrespective of the pages of the thread, the discussion ongoing aren't usually a repeated one.

This is definitely the case in boards like Technical Support or Technical Discussion, where often it can be counter productive to lock old threads. Bumping an old thread which discusses the same problem/issue/idea/proposal/etc. as you were going to start a new thread about prevents users having to repeat the same information over and over, and allows you to build on top of ideas or solutions which have already been discussed.

This is largely not the case, however, in boards like Bitcoin Discussion. Topics like "Is this the best time for Bitcoin" and "Are people afraid of investing in Bitcoin" can and will be posted in ad infinitum by spammers because it is incredibly easily to churn out a generic two line reply which adds nothing to the discussion but fulfills their posting quota. Such thread should be locked.

[tbct_mt2]

Spam mega threads are not issues if there is no signature in those threads. People will not complain about it. However, without signature, less people will post in Spammega threads and when time goes longer, total number of spam mega threads will be decreased.

Wall Observer, no one complains about its and what people post in it. Signature is disabled in Wall Observer and no campaigns count posts in WO for payments.

Regards to managers, count which posts are accepted for payments and which posts are not accepted, it belongs to them. Spam mega thread or not, it does not make sense. There are good posts everyewhere, even in spam mega threads. Unfortunately, same quality posts in non-spammega thread and spammega thread have different attention and traffic for companies, less of posts in spammega threads.

[Pmalek]

I often post in a Mega thread in the gambling section about the Italian Serie A. I do it because I like Italian football and there are a few members there who know what they are talking about. There is a lot of crap and spam as well but I the entire thread isn't a spam thread and doesn't deserve to be locked in my opinion. It started at the beginning of the season and contains discussions about a whole bunch of things.

The gambling board is full of mega threads. Just take a look at any of the threads of the Bitcoin Casinos. But you can't close these as they have a purpose.
There are many other examples in Gambling Discussion.

Here are just 3 examples from the top of the page currently:

FreeBitco 657 pages.
Stake 300 pages.
Crypto.Games 287 pages

[Mrengage]

Hi Folks 

How many threads exceeded 10 pages after they have already served their purposes in the first 2 pages? Thousands i guess.

I don't know if mods have the ability to lock threads. But when i think that they can, i can't find reasons why they don't just lock those thousands of useless threads !

I have a suggestion that I'd like to see implemented if this is technically possible : If at least 10 full members+ report a specific thread with a specific code (it can be an option available only for those ranks), then mods should revise the thread and lock it and a message automatically sent to the creator of that thread informing him that it was deleted (like the "deleted post" message).
This option can also be limited to some boards, like excluding the "Bounties" section where users report weekly works and the project announcements board.
If this suggestion, or any other solution, be implemented, i think it will surely serve to limit spam in many boards like "Bitcoin Discussion" and "Altcoin Discussion" who are a useful great boards but full of shit replies in some great topics.

I don't know if this was suggested before. I want to know your opinions or guide me where a similar option had been discussed before .

Cheers 

Post I see mostly now is the bounty threads been handled by newbies which supposed not to be so and probably someone high ranks or most Members of the forum will say we should look away from it probably those Bounty topics which are spammers and scammers supposed not to remain on the forum instead of giving them RED trusted or negative trust only.

[NavI_027]

I often post in a Mega thread in the gambling section about the Italian Serie A. I do it because I like Italian football and there are a few members there who know what they are talking about. There is a lot of crap and spam as well but I the entire thread isn't a spam thread and doesn't deserve to be locked in my opinion. It started at the beginning of the season and contains discussions about a whole bunch of things.

Yeah! I understand your sentiment dude. I also like engaging with some of the discussions there especially when it comes to NBA, PBA and UFC so I will be sad if ever such threads will finally come to an end. But in my opinion, I think these could be included on the exemptions since the discussion there does not only revolve in a single topic. Sports updates keep on coming from time to time thus opening gateway for new discussions . The ideas there are not so repetitive compared to spam megathreads.

[UmerIdrees]

But isn't this a platform meant for continues discussion? There are some or specific topic that are meant to be left open because irrespective of the pages of the thread, the discussion ongoing aren't usually a repeated one. Also in prevention of having repeated or similar thread created, the open thread will serve as a reminder that there's a topic currently active on the same topic.
 

Yes, all threads with a lot of pages does not count in SPAM MEGA THREADS. There are some threads in gambling discussions which are based upon the discussion of sports like Test Cricket Prediction and Discussion Thread [self - mod] where you will find sports discussion of every new match. So such threads should not be considered as MegaSpam threads.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

I avoid pointing fingers or will I say calling out threads by their title to avoid my message getting misunderstood. Some of this thread we presume to serve a purpose of discussing sport event are just worthless spam mega thread because when you visit the thread, although there's continue discussion ongoing, most of them are just worthless piece of junk. You see shitposter constantly using that particular thread to complete their weekly post qouta without adding any meaningful contributions.

Observe carefully you'll identity users that are making a genuine contributions to thread and those just doing so to 'fullfil all righteousness'. Not pointing fingers on the thread you gave as example but what I'm trying to say is, just because a thread is huge in gambling boards doesn't mean it isn't a spam mega thread.