This is an interesting perspective, it's entirely possible that the US government learned from what happened in 2008 that if they just gave money to the rich and saved them from the economic crisis that they themselves caused people will be very upset about it and that is never a good thing especially when the elections are so close, so they decided to give part of that money to the people so they were happy and they did not saw that the majority of the money went to Wall Street anyway.
As we know, the dollar circulating outside America is three times than the dollar circulating domestically. The majority of dollars circulating abroad are controlled through wall street. Wall street is a representation of "real money owner" and not a representation of the American government. Thus, the view of the American government, because of the large amount and scope of Wall Street wealth, the destructive effect would be greater if Wall Street collapsed, in other words the United States financial corporation has gone global and must be saved.
If the United States recovers, the world will recover. The bailout policy is always a high-stake drama negotiation, between several parties, as currently there are negotiations between Trump, Bidden, the finance minister, the FED and the senate. Congressional approval is required for the bailout package to go down. Saving the wall street means the economy will rotate while providing a stimulus to the community means to boost demand without being followed by an increase in production.
