Meta discussions with system wide implications being pushed to rep by mods?

[KaneVWE]

Why would a discussion seeking clarity on the permissible use of provable lies as a basis for a red tag be moved to rep?
If people want specific details as to use as examples for the debate that does not make it a rep thread.

The answer is a yes it is permissible for DT1 known scammer facilitator or any other DT1 to use provable lies as a basis for red tags or it is not.

This is not specific member applicable. This discussion is to decide if that is a step too far.
We know they can just make up things that are impossible to disprove however improbable just to silence or punish whistle blowers or competition but using provable lies as a basis for a red tag seems a step too far.


Let's discuss this again. In meta.

Yes or No.. you can not state someone took a certain action on this forum when it is possible to conclusively prove they did not.

How hard can this be to tackle?

Yes or No with an explanation.

[Jet Cash]

I guess it is a difficult decision for the mods, but it is important to keep meta on track, and not fill it with just a couple of topics. I can see why such threads are moved to reputation, as accusations of lying and malpractices against specific members are really attacks on their reputations.

[KaneVWE]

I guess it is a difficult decision for the mods, but it is important to keep meta on track, and not fill it with just a couple of topics. I can see why such threads are moved to reputation, as accusations of lying and malpractices against specific members are really attacks on their reputations.

You need to clarify 2 points.

1. This specific meta suitable discussion only needs to be discussed thoroughly once. Either it is okay for DT1 to use provable lies as a basis for red tags or it is not.

A hypothetical example would be if I lied and said you have left a red tag that states I scammed you out of 10btc. This is provably a lie. 

2. If they are provable lies then they are not simply accusations. They are statements of truth.

However there is no need to even get specific to certain members unless other members ask for an example.

[suchmoon]