Why would you need to speak to Satoshi, and how this replica can answer the questions only he would be able to answer?
I don't think it's the best idea to go this route, but it's an intresting path nevertheless.
Thank you for engaging with my post and for raising these excellent, fundamental questions. You've gone straight to the heart of the matter.
"Why speak to Satoshi?" – For me, it's less about seeking answers from a person and more about rigorously stress-testing ideas against his documented, immutable philosophy. In times of noise, it's a thought experiment to ask: "Which of our current debates are about the protocol's core principles, and which are about transient market psychology that Satoshi explicitly ignored?"
"How can a replica answer what only he could?" – It can't, and it shouldn't. The value isn't in getting "new" answers. It's in using his known writings as a litmus test for consistency. For example, the AI models overwhelmingly highlighted his focus on long-term protocol security over short-term price. The question then becomes: Are we, as a community, still using that same litmus test for the projects and news we discuss today?
I agree it's not a perfect path, and it's certainly not about replacing critical thought. But as an intellectual exercise, it helped me refocus on first principles. I'm more interested in your second point: what do you think are the most important 'questions only Satoshi could answer' that we're still grappling with today?
Again, I appreciate the thoughtful critique.