The Smoking Gun: Where Is the Coronavirus? The CDC Says It Isn't Available.

[BADecker]

Dr. Andrew Kaufman ( https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/ ) has been right all along. We find buried deep in CDC documents, that the CDC doesn't have an isolated Covid virus, and that (because of this) the Covid virus isn't available. The whole pandemic is BS, and the CDC admits it. And the CDC knew this at least since July, but really, right from the beginning.


The Smoking Gun: Where Is the Coronavirus? The CDC Says It Isn't Available.

The CDC document is titled, "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel." It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, "Performance Characteristics," we have this: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…"

The key phrase there is: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…"

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term "quantified" in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word 'isolates." This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn't-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn't been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe "you have the virus but it is not available," and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn't been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. "We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don't know where." If you don't know where, you don't know you have the money.

"The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don't where." Really? If you don't know where, you don't know the keys are in the house.

"The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don't where." No. If you don't know where, you don't know the missile is in the arsenal.

"The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven't removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we've identified it and we know its structure." NO YOU DON'T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

...

Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.

[franky1]

what you are not realising is you are not reading the full context

the virus has been isolated in different labs using different techniques all around the world. so this passes the koch,rivers,bell independant and decentralisation rebuttles.

thy know the RNA.
wht they can then do. instead of taking a random sample to use as a control/quality assurance test of equipment.

they can then mimic the chemical makeup of the RNA to then under full knowledge of how concentrated/diluted their control sample is. they can then test the detection capability of the equipment.

its like making a machine that detects iron in blood. .. they can create a control sample of lab fluid with their own supply of iron in differing amounts. to then test the quality of the equipment. because they are in full control of how much iron they are putting into the sample

this is then used to set a 'threshold' for what they define as a positive test. thus also debunking you and tash's ignorant thoughts that its just a binary yes or no.

instead its a count. where if above a threshold its classed as positive

this explains trumps muttering of 'im negative but not sure if results are low or free'
because its a scale
so no. even if you only had one particle of covid it would not show as positive.
it actually requires a certain amount of covid for it to affect a person. this is called the viral load.

they test the concentrate based on under 1, 1 and 3 particles per cubic millimeter
(drop the size of a matchstick head)
which is a low amount of virus
the results are
~ 13/20 pass on under 1copies per microlitre
~ 17/20 pass on 1 copies per microlitre
~ 20/20 pass on 3 copies per microlitre
this very sensative. and also debunks the whole idiot theory that it tests everyone as positive

once you learn about viral load you will understand the precautions of distance and mask is to help ensure people do not get hit by high viral load. and the lower the viral load your hit with the less it will harm you.

so go learn viral load, thresholds, Limit of Detection, viral count

[BADecker]

^^^ As the CDC admits that they don't have an isolated Covid virus, your faith is gradually being shown to be misplaced.

Why do I say faith? Because anybody can blab that anything has been done... or hasn't been done.

Still waiting for you to show the wording from a linked lab report where the isolating has been properly done... and explain it. Since you can't even show it, you probably wouldn't recognize it if it jumped up and bit you in the eyeball.

You are losing it. Come on. Nobody wants to see you destroy yourself. Wake up, franky1. The whole Covid thing is lacking in science. Or have you finally found a report wherein you can show us the pertinent parts thereof?

[franky1]

^^^ As the CDC admits that they don't have an isolated Covid virus, your faith is gradually being shown to be misplaced.

your conspiracy sites limited context of the whole understanding of the report is the flaw.
their opinion is 'thats what it says'
but if you read what the report is actually about and its purpose. you will understand.

its about understanding the context of  topic and not phishing for selective wording which you dont understand

maybe if you read the whole document from and not just auto-hump a conspiracy sites summary. you might learn something

[franky1]

oh and one last little diddy to really hit you hard
the report is actually from .. the FDA.
its the FDA quality assurance report. not a CDC lab report.

have fun with that.. oops. you didnt realise that.. well i guess thats because you fell down the wrong hole because you didnt do your research

FDA does not like to store viruses. its not their job

also to note.. other labs. other countries. other reports exist that also use human samples containing covid. which also adds ammo to 'the gun' that it hit its target
and didnt miss. unlike what you think happened.

and let me pre-empt you.
i can predict you will divert to the rna sequence that is known as a 'human dna'
well in the same report found on the FDA site. it actually explains the HUMAN SPECIMEN CONTROL. and actually explains its use as a negative control to separate out the human parts of the sample
because once they remove all human elements of the sample. what must be left is the virus. which they can then test.
enjoy actually reading reports. and not just getting false summaries from conspiracy sites

[BADecker]

^^^ As the CDC admits that they don't have an isolated Covid virus, your faith is gradually being shown to be misplaced.

your conspiracy sites limited context of the whole understanding of the CDC report is the flaw.
their opinion is 'thats what it says'
but if you read what the report is actually about and its purpose. you will understand.

its about understanding the context of  topic and not phishing for selective wording which you dont understand

maybe if you read the whole document from the CDC and not just auto-hump a conspiracy sites summary. you might learn something

Maybe if you would start reading the facts:
1. The CDC admits they haven't isolated the virus;
2. The CDC admits they don't have a report form someone else that shows the virus was isolated;
3. Other people state the same thing, that there is no report showing isolation;
4. All you can do is blab rather than coming up with, and explaining proper, uncontaminated isolation in a report;
5. Nobody else is willing to show an isolation report that has proper isolation...

... just maybe you would start to realize that Covid is all a hoax.

Find one yet?

[BADecker]

oh and one last little diddy to really hit you hard
the report is actually from .. the FDA.

Lol. So, it is the FDA reporting on the CDC, eh? Now you have two major American medical organizations saying that there has been no isolation of Covid.

Keep on digging your hole deeper, lol.

[franky1]

^^^ As the CDC admits that they don't have an isolated Covid virus, your faith is gradually being shown to be misplaced.

your conspiracy sites limited context of the whole understanding of the CDC report is the flaw.
their opinion is 'thats what it says'
but if you read what the report is actually about and its purpose. you will understand.

its about understanding the context of  topic and not phishing for selective wording which you dont understand

maybe if you read the whole document from the CDC and not just auto-hump a conspiracy sites summary. you might learn something

Maybe if you would start reading the facts:
1. The CDC admits they haven't isolated the virus;
2. The CDC admits they don't have a report form someone else that shows the virus was isolated;
3. Other people state the same thing, that there is no report showing isolation;
4. All you can do is blab rather than coming up with, and explaining proper, uncontaminated isolation in a report;
5. Nobody else is willing to show an isolation report that has proper isolation...

... just maybe you would start to realize that Covid is all a hoax.

Find one yet?

i guesd you still didnt read the report
one part..performance test
Performance of the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel has only been established in upper and lower respiratory specimens (such as nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs, sputum, lower respiratory tract aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage, and nasopharyngeal wash/aspirate or nasal aspirate).

another part. the limit of detection (the quality control test)
 tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen

if you cannot read the report to understand and know what the report is saying. then please dont pretend you know what it says
especially if your source is a summary from a conspiracy site

[BADecker]

^^^ As the CDC admits that they don't have an isolated Covid virus, your faith is gradually being shown to be misplaced.

your conspiracy sites limited context of the whole understanding of the CDC report is the flaw.
their opinion is 'thats what it says'
but if you read what the report is actually about and its purpose. you will understand.

its about understanding the context of  topic and not phishing for selective wording which you dont understand

maybe if you read the whole document from the CDC and not just auto-hump a conspiracy sites summary. you might learn something

Maybe if you would start reading the facts:
1. The CDC admits they haven't isolated the virus;
2. The CDC admits they don't have a report form someone else that shows the virus was isolated;
3. Other people state the same thing, that there is no report showing isolation;
4. All you can do is blab rather than coming up with, and explaining proper, uncontaminated isolation in a report;
5. Nobody else is willing to show an isolation report that has proper isolation...

... just maybe you would start to realize that Covid is all a hoax.

Find one yet?

i guesd you still didnt read the report
one part..performance test
Performance of the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel has only been established in upper and lower respiratory specimens (such as nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs, sputum, lower respiratory tract aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage, and nasopharyngeal wash/aspirate or nasal aspirate).

another part. the limit of detection (the quality control test)
 tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen

if you cannot read the report to understand and know what the report is saying. then please dont pretend you know what it says
especially if your source is a summary from a conspiracy site

Well i'll be a ... I'll think of something later. franky1 is actually starting to explain a report.

All it means, franky1, is that they are making comparisons against something that is not quite the DNA of an actual virus. There is no reference to the isolation report that shows that the RNA is from a specimen that was virus isolated. The specimen could be anything. As has been shown by Dr. Kaufman and others, the virus RNA/DNA matches a segment of Chromosome 8 in all our cells.

The place in an above post where you talk about removing all the human material from the specimen, doesn't leave only the virus. Rather, it leaves all kinds of viruses and bacteria and who-knows-what else. Since the virus purportedly contains strands of DNA/RNA that are already found in Chromosme 8, removing all human presence would actually remove the virus, itself. Why? You can't tell the difference between virus DNA and Chromosome 8 DNA. There isn't any difference that we are smart enough to detect at the current stage of science.

In other words, the whole report referred to is simply circular blab that really has no meaning as far as medical application. On the outside it looks good. But it doesn't really say anything. There still isn't any isolated virus. Anybody can talk. This report isn't the isolation report. Let's see an isolation report.

What I mean is, you can say the virus was isolated. I might say it wasn't. But you know it was isolated because you know the location of a report that shows isolation was done properly, and the spot in the report. This is very unkind of you to not show us the report and the isolation spot. Are we supposed to travel over the entire earth, looking at all reports, until we find the right one, to find out that you are telling the truth?

[suchmoon]

BADecker might be on to something here. To my knowledge the CDC (or the FDA for that matter) haven't isolated God. Therefore God doesn't exist. I'm glad we've settled this once and for all.

[BADecker]

BADecker might be on to something here. To my knowledge the CDC (or the FDA for that matter) haven't isolated God. Therefore God doesn't exist. I'm glad we've settled this once and for all.

God wasn't trying to get a CDC or FDA. He wanted the people to look to Him for healing. But He finally isolated the CDC and FDA. Now he is developing a vaccine for them.

[suchmoon]

God wasn't trying to get a CDC or FDA. He wanted the people to look to Him for healing. But He finally isolated the CDC and FDA. Now he is developing a vaccine for them.

I'm sorry, I know this is heartbreaking for you but you just proved yourself that God doesn't exist. Nobody has seen him through a microscope or a telescope. I don't think there is even nose swab test to detect the God infection so God is even less real than the non-existent covid. Negative real.

[BADecker]

God wasn't trying to get a CDC or FDA. He wanted the people to look to Him for healing. But He finally isolated the CDC and FDA. Now he is developing a vaccine for against them.

I'm sorry, I know this is heartbreaking for you but you just proved yourself that God doesn't exist. Nobody has seen him through a microscope or a telescope. I don't think there is even nose swab test to detect the God infection so God is even less real than the non-existent covid. Negative real.

I meant "against" above.

The proof for God is the machine universe, as you well know. Machines have makers.

[suchmoon]

The proof for God is the machine universe, as you well know. Machines have makers.

You might want to read the OP of this thread. Unless the CDC confirms the existence of God we can be certain he doesn't exist.

[Tash]

Classic, lets go to a planet we dont know if it exist. Everyone ready for boarding?
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=155715

[BADecker]

^^^ Thank you, Tash.

The proof for God is the machine universe, as you well know. Machines have makers.

You might want to read the OP of this thread. Unless the CDC confirms the existence of God we can be certain he doesn't exist.

The CDC is made up of machines. Some of it, their organizing of their operation, is man-made machinery that uses God-made universe machinery. But they themselves are machines of the universe machine. The only "Guy" Who could create/make the universe machinery is God. Machines have makers.

[suchmoon]

~

I'm getting a feeling that you haven't seen God yourself and you're just trusting someone who told you that he exists (and that he's a "he" apparently). Not cool. You're supposed to verify everything yourself.

[franky1]

if badeckers was a bitcoin client. he would be a web wallet.
he doesnt care about verifying. he just wants to push data and hope that it gets confirmed.

he is very much relient on middlemen servicing him

i dont think badecker gets the proper concept of bitcoin or research in general

badecker responds below but still doesnt realise that i read the reports and studies wrote by the doctors performing the tests, trials, experiments, research.

but badecker quotes conspiracy sites. that link to other people that are not virologists that do any studies.

i dont think badecker understands researching the source. even when this post has been very clearly hinting that what he does is not research

[BADecker]

~

I'm getting a feeling that you haven't seen God yourself and you're just trusting someone who told you that he exists (and that he's a "he" apparently). Not cool. You're supposed to verify everything yourself.

It's kinda the other way around. God makes Himself known spiritually, to the spirits of all people. You are simply one of those who are ignoring God whispering to them in spirit.

[BADecker]

if badeckers was a bitcoin client. he would be a web wallet.
he doesnt care about verifying. he just wants to push data and hope that it gets confirmed.

he is very much relient on middlemen servicing him

i dont think badecker gets the proper concept of bitcoin or research in general

Wow! Here's franky1 stating that BADecker is relying on middlemen. Yet he, himself, relies on a complete assumptive interpretation of the writings of all kinds of other middlemen. Amazing, isn't it, that he can't even find something conclusive in all this.