How science works

[CryptocurencyKing]

All scientific research that is done is a fact. Some of it is proven fact. Some of it is not proven fact. If there are notebooks and records and videos of a particular piece of scientific research, it is most likely proven to have been done.

I don't really understand what your trying to mean here by saying, all scientific research being done is a fact. While in high school and elementary school, when being thought on scientific procedures, there are steps before we could call a thing a fact. Thats why the theory does exists because, not everything could be regarded as a fact. Why?
Before any part or all of a research could be called a fact, it must have satisfied the condition that, it would produce the same result when repeated anytime and anywhere around the world and certainly, not all scientific research can satisfactory attain this affirmation of science.

[franky1]

All scientific research that is done is a fact. Some of it is proven fact. Some of it is not proven fact. If there are notebooks and records and videos of a particular piece of scientific research, it is most likely proven to have been done.

I don't really understand what your trying to mean here by saying,

dont worry about badecker
he believes in gods, witchcraft and herbal remedies. he thinks his male masseuse is the only true best medical doctor on the planet.. just because he cosplays a doctor by wearing a white jacket while giving badecker a 'rub'

he isnt on this forum to actually inform people of fact. he is on this forum to write crap to convince himself that his own warped reality is as he says. he thinks if he can see his words infront of him and find other idiots to believe him then he can find success in his warped prospective.

its like them kids that stand on the top of tall buildings. repeating to themselves 'i can fly i can fly' before jumping.. trying to convince themselves of a good reason to jump off a building..
the only result these idiots will have is 'splat'

[BADecker]

All scientific research that is done is a fact. Some of it is proven fact. Some of it is not proven fact. If there are notebooks and records and videos of a particular piece of scientific research, it is most likely proven to have been done.

I don't really understand what your trying to mean here by saying, all scientific research being done is a fact. While in high school and elementary school, when being thought on scientific procedures, there are steps before we could call a thing a fact. Thats why the theory does exists because, not everything could be regarded as a fact. Why?
Before any part or all of a research could be called a fact, it must have satisfied the condition that, it would produce the same result when repeated anytime and anywhere around the world and certainly, not all scientific research can satisfactory attain this affirmation of science.

If you washed the dishes, is it a fact that you washed the dishes or not? If you didn't get them as clean as your wife would have, or if you didn't rinse the soap off them, that doesn't mean that you didn't wash the dishes. No. If you washed the dishes, then you factually washed the dishes. But if you didn't wash them, then you factually didn't wash them.

If a scientific researcher researches a piece of science, it is a fact that he did the scientific research in question. If he didn't research the piece of science, then it is a fact that he didn't do it.

In other words, all scientific research that is done is factually done. If it wasn't done, then it factually wasn't done. What's so hard to understand about this? Somebody else might say that it wasn't done, but if it wasn't done, only then was it factually not done. However, if it was done, then it factually was done.

In my talk with franky1, the idea really never is that the Covid virus wasn't ever isolated. There could have been 50,000 researchers that isolated the Covid virus. If they did it, then it was factually done. Just because they didn't write down their notes regarding the process they used to isolate, or just because they didn't video it all, and even if they disposed of all the equipment, the samples, and the results, their notes, and the videos, doesn't mean that they did not do isolating of the virus. They still factually did it if they did it. If they didn't do it, then they factually didn't do it.

They might say that they did the isolation. If there aren't any notes or videos, other people might ask if they are lying, or if they are mentally disturbed. But if they did it, they factually did it. They might be able to mimic the processes they used well enough that they could convince some other people that they must have really done it. But the point remains. If they did the isolation, then they factually did it. If they didn't do the isolation, then they factually didn't do it.

Now that we have that out of the way, we can try to find out if they actually did it, or find the place where they hid their in-process notes and the videos. Once we get those, we can start to determine for our own satisfaction if they truly isolated the virus or not, or if they made a bunch of mistakes and didn't really isolate the virus after all. Because even if they thought they did, even if they were sincere, even if they went through a bunch of complex procedures, but really messed up and didn't isolate the virus, then the fact is that they didn't isolate the virus.

Either way, there will be a bunch of people who weigh in on whether or not the isolation was done. Points will have to be compared, and compared with sound logic both of the present and of the past. Sure would help to have those in-process notes and videos.

[Mr.right85]

Science works on findings. Findings that are believed to be true until proven otherwise. There is a systematic nature about it and laws for which Science do work with and thats the beauty about it. It looks to bring out the truth in every concept as much as possible but there could always be errors on the way and science do well to recognise and accepts those errors. This is why a failed result in an experiment is also a result because, it points out the end point of a particular procedure. Science is one of the best thing to have happened to humanity and the people in the field are handling it greatly.

[franky1]

In my talk with franky1, the idea really never is that the Covid virus wasn't ever isolated. There could have been 50,000 researchers that isolated the Covid virus. If they did it, then it was factually done. Just because they didn't write down their notes regarding the process they used to isolate, or just because they didn't video it all, and even if they disposed of all the equipment, the samples, and the results, their notes, and the videos, doesn't mean that they did not do isolating of the virus. They still factually did it if they did it. If they didn't do it, then they factually didn't do it.

they done the isolation
they done the notes.. contact them if still unsure

maybe if you fear contacting them. then instead learn to read the reports..

and again as a re-reminder the notes do explain all the equipment used and even include your required centrifuge.. and there are test results and pictures

seems you keep forgetting that.

i know you want to reply that the notes are not in dumb arizonian basement dweller language.. or if there was a summary that was in dumb basement dwelling arizonian language you will say the summary is not the report..
so just take the hint you dont need replay your flip flops anymore to avoid reading/accepting the reports exist.. or flip flop about if isolation has or has not been done.
if you are unsure contact the doctors that done it. their names can be found in the reports

the fact that lots of lab in lots of countries have done it. should wake you up to the facts.
we are not living in january 2020 anymore.. alot has happened since then

[BADecker]

In my talk with franky1, the idea really never is that the Covid virus wasn't ever isolated. There could have been 50,000 researchers that isolated the Covid virus. If they did it, then it was factually done. Just because they didn't write down their notes regarding the process they used to isolate, or just because they didn't video it all, and even if they disposed of all the equipment, the samples, and the results, their notes, and the videos, doesn't mean that they did not do isolating of the virus. They still factually did it if they did it. If they didn't do it, then they factually didn't do it.

they done the isolation
they done the notes.. contact them if still unsure

When I was first hearing why isolating of SARS-CoV-2 was probably never done, I simply listened to the points about it, and it made real sense. But I have other focuses in life, so I didn't get right down and think hard about it.

Youtube has loads of instructional videos. For example, Youtube search on "slam gun." All kinds of videos will come up with complete, step-by-step videos about how to make your own guns, with pictures of in-proccess making of the guns, right at home, easy and cheap. And there are instructional videos on Youtube on all kinds of things that go right through the step-by-step process of doing whatever.

If you search Youtube for "covid virus isolation," you will get all kinds of videos that state how the process is done, governments and medical people saying it was done, all kinds of videos pertaining to info about it being done - or not - but you don't find any of the actual process being carried out while it is being done. And you don't even find any real instructional videos showing step-by-step what is happening, with real equipment being shown in the explanation.

Since any isolation process since Kock's Postulates has contamination possibility built right into the process, where is the video of the process being carried out with instructions about what is being done, as the steps of the process are being done, so we all can see that there wasn't any contamination?

Covid is important around the world. So it is important that we get the actual right thing, so we know exactly what we are looking at in the electron microscope.

Youtube bans as many videos where people talk anti-medical-establishment about Covid as they can. And they show as many videos of people talking the same stuff about Covid as the medical says. But nobody posts the in-process, step-by-step of Covid being isolated by Koch's and Rivers' Postulates, the two most contamination free methods for isolating viruses. Why?

I would think that the videos would be the most important way to prove Covid. Yet in the controversy about whether or not the virus even exists, nobody can seem to come up with even one video of it being done. Or can you find some of them for us?

[franky1]

there is no video that shows how blockchain data is stored on hard drives.. so in badeckers ignorance he wil say blockchains are a fantasy thats not been proven.

thats how silly badecker is
he asks for reports that explain the process.. people link him the reports.. badecker ignores them and say wheres the lay-man summaries
he has for lay-man summaries that explain the process. people show him summaries. badecker ignores them and says these are not the reports/notes

flip flop back and forth

his latest dribble is there is no video.. even though his attempt to ask for a video is just to say 'its not the notes'

maybe he should set his browser to block conspiracy websites to make him less addictively look at conspiracy sites via prevention.. and then search out the real information

maybe if badecker for once read the reports. seen the equipment used. research how the equipment works. then he can finally learn something

as for him pretending he has seen videos of it being done. but nothing showing them using the actual equipment.. that is a lie. i just youtubed and in the first few videos i can clearly see they use equipment like the QIAcube and the illumina equipment

even in a video from australia in january 2020..
so thus debunking badecker and showing he is 15 months out of date

[BADecker]

there is no video that shows how blockchain data is stored on hard drives.. so in badeckers ignorance he wil say blockchains are a fantasy thats not been proven.

thats how silly badecker is
he asks for reports that explain the process.. people link him the reports.. badecker ignores them and say wheres the lay-man summaries
he has for lay-man summaries that explain the process. people show him summaries. badecker ignores them and says these are not the reports/notes

flip flop back and forth

his latest dribble is there is no video.. even though his attempt to ask for a video is just to say 'its not the notes'

maybe he should set his browser to block conspiracy websites to make him less addictively look at conspiracy sites via prevention.. and then search out the real information

maybe if badecker for once read the reports. seen the equipment used. research how the equipment works. then he can finally learn something

as for him pretending he has seen videos of it being done. but nothing showing them using the actual equipment.. that is a lie. i just youtubed and in the first few videos i can clearly see they use equipment like the QIAcube and the illumina equipment

even in a video from australia in january 2020..
so thus debunking badecker and showing he is 15 months out of date

People aren't generally fearing for their lives from the blockchain, lol. Isolating the Covid virus is important. Why no videos for something this important?

[franky1]

there are videos.. but i know you want to see some strange video that shows not the equipment being used but humans with tiny nanoscopic hands touching the virus and dry humping it as 'your proof'

i know any and all videos that show lab-techs using equipment and showing an end result you will ignore and then ask for one of your other spiralling repeats

maybe start by reading the reports and looking at the equipment listed in the reports and then researching what the equipment does..
and then when you finally are ready you can then see there are loads of videos showing the labtechs using the equipment

i know that your conspiracy sites dont show the reports/summaries/videos and thats why you think they dont exist. but please do try to do your research

if your still unsure you can always contact the doctors that made the reports. after all you will always revert to saying you require first hand witness testimony straight from the mouths of those involved.

so instead of wasting a year explaining all the excuses why you wont do the research/ignore the stuff spoonfed to you. how about not wasting another year and instead just do the research


edit to reply to below
there are loads of reports and stuff. your decision to not look for them is your flaw
you speaking with ignorant people like yourself who also dont bother looking is your other flaw

try to actually look instead of pleading ignorance as your proof of no proof

[BADecker]

I know, I know. Simply because I said you couldn't find any, now you aren't going to show any at all... just to spite me. Because there are so many of them out there in the public, that show anything at all without contamination, why can't anybody find even one?