Everyon's opinion about "antique" alt-coins from 5-6 years ago with - trade vol?

[willoweb7]

I have a bunch of coins I purchased in 2014 (just prior to Monero and during the time DARK (now dash) came out. To my regret I bought into some shit-coins
and now there is no trade volume. For example MOTO (the first "Proof of Play" coin) is no longer tradeable - well the wallet is not available (generally speaking to the public any longer much like "abandonware-coin?") - I do have it somewhere mind you..., although there is a tiny trade volume on yobit.net
Also this coin isn't mineable as it has some odd game that 1 person designed a bot for.

Just a question overall, from opinions about whether such "antique" alt-coins can be considered "collectibles" - and why not. Because for example MOTO is non-inflationary with a finite number of coins if I'm not mistaken, shouldn't they appreciate in some sense? As opposed to new alt-coins with no trade history - like many alt-coins that sank to the bottom of the crypto ocean. Will they remain there?

[Ucy]

I think it could be considered collectible if it served very important purposes, or was very useful/like by its users or community back then. Maybe they couldn't continue the project due to factor beyond their control, or other reasons, then abandoned it? The project would need to be really useful or popular in the past for me to probably consider it a collectible.

 

[jrrsparkles]

Collectibles are often considered as investments so making investment on a thing which has no value at all and in future as well there will be no value the ln it has zero chance to be considered as collectible item.

[boyptc]

You can simply define them as collectibles but unless there's no market for it, you're the only one who's taking it for that purpose.

If there's no market and volume, it's hard to sell that even in the near future unless there will be some whales that will take a look on it and will start pumping it.