Yeah. No exclusivity, no transfereable digital rights, except to the NFT itself.
It's highly stupid, and reminds me exactly of what the high-class luxury art world is all about. People paying a lot of money for things they don't understand.
Keir Finlow-Bates pointed out on a podcast yesterday and I roughly paraphrase: You're buying a finger pointing to the moon.
You can change who owns the finger, but if the moon changes or disappears or moves, the finger is still pointing to that same spot.
Finally found someone with the same thought and I'd say this hype is pretty stupid.
I know this is crazy, NFT is booming and people are spending a lot of money for just a digital art or collectibles where they can easily pay the best graphic artist in town, for at least a thousand dollar and not a million dollar. The hype of NFT is still here, rich people will continue to spend their money for sure.
All those rich brats are buying things that has literally the same value even before those arts are being put into NFT. There is no purpose or anything about purchasing those NFT instead of just flexing to the whole world that you are rich and sooner or later this hype will die.
Not sure if this can be tokenized though, Im not totally following all this NFT shit. Its totally absurd
Right, in the end everyone would tokenized almost everything that is 'unique' and sell it to some rich guy that has tons of money to spend. Perhaps we will see Mr Beast selling his first ever youtube video in form of NFT? that would be hilarious if that happens
Not sure if it can be tokenized though, Im not totally following this whole NFT shit because its too absurd to be honest. No offense to anyone that supports it