"We need to censor Ron Desantis, NOW /anger&rage"

[fastlight]

https://www.tampabay.com/resizer/ix0CrSxMzZY0bLWDj9DpTSkCjr4=/992x0/smart/filters:quality(60)/s3.amazonaws.com/arc-wordpress-client-uploads/tbt/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/08162821/27079701965_045f78d344_b.jpg

gl&hf...

as said, this crap of mandatory injection sneaked in a law, very very bad, but just for the lulz and as long as this legal aberation remains, I can't endorse nor hide my laughter at silicon valley and others demoNcrats dilema...

they want to censor, beat, intimidate, harrass, doxx, and even vaxx everyone and everything... they need to be reigned in.

they are the real terrorists...

so Ronie, if you get in the WH and see the real 911 or pedogate file, can we expect corpses? will the enemy combatants in charge of the propganda and censorship corpses be lined up for miles and miles to even fill the gulf of mexico?

as said I don't care...

with PRC and PLA

a professional army
a patriotic army
a popular army
a populist army

for a great rejuvenation in moderate growth for a prosperous, stabile, harmonious, safe, kind and loving future !

[BADecker]

Consider this one thing that you can use to nullify almost any activity that government does against people. It's known as the office of the person.

In law and statutes, generally people are not persons. It's in the definitions, and the way they are construed - with the word includes.

Desantis can't apply his stuff to people except that they accept that they are persons. If they announce that they are not the person so indicated, but rather a man or woman, and that they don't know anything other than that, most law doesn't include them.

See https://redress4dummies.wordpress.com//?s=office+of+the+person&search=Go
particularly https://redress4dummies.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/office-of-person1.pdf.

This works even for traffic tickets, but you gotta screw your head on straight right from the start, and be strong against their suggestions you are what they say you are. Screwing your head on straight means that you can't answer any questions they ask of the person, but stay strong that they are not talking to you when they direct person questions at you. Before they can prove you guilty of a traffic ticket, they have to prove that you are the person in the statute. Look at the definitions. Person doesn't include people, men, or women.

They will want to avoid this court battle, because they don't want other people to know that they are not persons.

Btw, the word acceptance is a legal term. You don't have to legally accept anything.

[fastlight]

There is your method, complex, intellectual, ineffective... here is just another one :


source image : https://i.insider.com/56ae4e2ac08a806f008bdebc?width=1200

I have more belief in this option. In the sense that there you play on an equal footing : individuals in a system wan to fuck your life, liberty or properity (judges, courts, cops etc), you can kill their wives, children and parents, and then, they will think, not only those who sought to terrorize you, but those coming after, if they want to live, or not be killed after their families, they will behave.

you understand my point?

Or look, PRC could have used your legal theories, to prevent the invasions of china, or as of now, after an insane multi generational armed struggle, build a coherent, comprehensive real multi factorial defense system. Guess which works? You go to feral gov and say, please, behave, don't rape us, don't loot us, etc, or simply show them the wall of war? Guess which one they only will understand once?

you can't make kung fu competition... it's not a sport, nor a game, but the art of war.

think about it...

and BUDESONIDE, good? working? why not hcq / ivermectine / zinc + c and d / mass water ?

[BADecker]

^^^ Seems like all you want is war. If you won't settle things in a peaceful way while there still is peace, you're just as bad as the thing you want to fight.

[fastlight]

^^^ Seems like all you want is war. If you won't settle things in a peaceful way while there still is peace, you're just as bad as the thing you want to fight.

worst . all your ways of thinking are in reality rooted in submission toward them. You seek to go before them, to not answer them, to make them change their minds etc.

the other option removes them from the equation entirely.

and it works, as they have now 2 choices, submit to your defensive lines (real, not verbal or intellectual) or die trying to breach them and make you surrender to their will, if they succeed.

this is the problem with your approach, you deeply want to believe there is a peaceful outcome, some kind of grand moment of happy ending ala hollywood, maybe it's your neuro-predictive-programing/training kicking in? sorry... I know it's harsh.

edit: why should the first one in the picture be a "hero" and not those on the second one? because the msn/culture/society say so? You pretend to be a man of God, right? who fight to exterminate a plant of the creation from the earth? and who try to save it? who respect the free will and informed consent of a buyer? who tries to interfer in market relation? see my point... you have a lot of glasses still to remove   .

[BADecker]

^^^ Seems like all you want is war. If you won't settle things in a peaceful way while there still is peace, you're just as bad as the thing you want to fight.

worst . all your ways of thinking are in reality rooted in submission toward them. You seek to go before them, to not answer them, to make them change their minds etc.

the other option removes them from the equation entirely.

and it works, as they have now 2 choices, submit to your defensive lines (real, not verbal or intellectual) or die trying to breach them and make you surrender to their will, if they succeed.

this is the problem with your approach, you deeply want to believe there is a peaceful outcome, some kind of grand moment of happy ending ala hollywood, maybe it's your neuro-predictive-programing/training kicking in? sorry... I know it's harsh.

edit: why should the first one in the picture be a "hero" and not those on the second one? because the msn/culture/society say so? You pretend to be a man of God, right? who fight to exterminate a plant of the creation from the earth? and who try to save it? who respect the free will and informed consent of a buyer? who tries to interfer in market relation? see my point... you have a lot of glasses still to remove   .

You are mistaken. You simply want a physical fight when physical fighting is unnecessary. That's what we have courts for... fighting with words so we don't have to kill each other off. Learn basic law, use it wipe out unlawful legalities, and live in peace.

I'm talking the US here. Other countries aren't the same.

[fastlight]

^^^ Seems like all you want is war. If you won't settle things in a peaceful way while there still is peace, you're just as bad as the thing you want to fight.

worst . all your ways of thinking are in reality rooted in submission toward them. You seek to go before them, to not answer them, to make them change their minds etc.

the other option removes them from the equation entirely.

and it works, as they have now 2 choices, submit to your defensive lines (real, not verbal or intellectual) or die trying to breach them and make you surrender to their will, if they succeed.

this is the problem with your approach, you deeply want to believe there is a peaceful outcome, some kind of grand moment of happy ending ala hollywood, maybe it's your neuro-predictive-programing/training kicking in? sorry... I know it's harsh.

edit: why should the first one in the picture be a "hero" and not those on the second one? because the msn/culture/society say so? You pretend to be a man of God, right? who fight to exterminate a plant of the creation from the earth? and who try to save it? who respect the free will and informed consent of a buyer? who tries to interfer in market relation? see my point... you have a lot of glasses still to remove   .

You are mistaken. You simply want a physical fight when physical fighting is unnecessary. That's what we have courts for... fighting with words so we don't have to kill each other off. Learn basic law, use it wipe out unlawful legalities, and live in peace.

I'm talking the US here. Other countries aren't the same.

Courts? Did I read it clear, you mean like for the potus election of 2020? that's what you are refering to? or you prefer to conform to  Jacobson v. Massachusetts of 1905? I let you think... ahh the former 1st republic of the usa... still in denial that it's over? okay... I think you will feel better if I tell you are right, all is good, but it would be lying to you.

Why are you so afraid of violence? What do you fear? Do you prefer slavery or liberty? remember you can't talk your slavemaster to give you liberty, you take it, from his dead hands.

[BADecker]

^^^ Seems like all you want is war. If you won't settle things in a peaceful way while there still is peace, you're just as bad as the thing you want to fight.

worst . all your ways of thinking are in reality rooted in submission toward them. You seek to go before them, to not answer them, to make them change their minds etc.

the other option removes them from the equation entirely.

and it works, as they have now 2 choices, submit to your defensive lines (real, not verbal or intellectual) or die trying to breach them and make you surrender to their will, if they succeed.

this is the problem with your approach, you deeply want to believe there is a peaceful outcome, some kind of grand moment of happy ending ala hollywood, maybe it's your neuro-predictive-programing/training kicking in? sorry... I know it's harsh.

edit: why should the first one in the picture be a "hero" and not those on the second one? because the msn/culture/society say so? You pretend to be a man of God, right? who fight to exterminate a plant of the creation from the earth? and who try to save it? who respect the free will and informed consent of a buyer? who tries to interfer in market relation? see my point... you have a lot of glasses still to remove   .

You are mistaken. You simply want a physical fight when physical fighting is unnecessary. That's what we have courts for... fighting with words so we don't have to kill each other off. Learn basic law, use it wipe out unlawful legalities, and live in peace.

I'm talking the US here. Other countries aren't the same.

Courts? Did I read it clear, you mean like for the potus election of 2020? that's what you are refering to? or you prefer to conform to  Jacobson v. Massachusetts of 1905? I let you think... ahh the former 1st republic of the usa... still in denial that it's over? okay... I think you will feel better if I tell you are right, all is good, but it would be lying to you.

Why are you so afraid of violence? What do you fear? Do you prefer slavery or liberty? remember you can't talk your slavemaster to give you liberty, you take it, from his dead hands.

For example, when GW bush won against Gore, and Gore took loads of voting machine hanging chads to SCOTUS to show the them that Bush cheated, Justice Scalia answered the question. He told Gore that all he needed was one man or woman to identify one of the hanging chads to be his/hers, and SCOTUS would convene the court.

Same with Trump. All Trump needs is one man or one woman to get up in court as a man or woman, not as a plaintiff or prosecutor, and say, "I was wronged, and here is the proof," and SCOTUS would be more than willing to convene a court case. But Trump doesn't want to do it that way, because then the people would find out that their power in the courts lies in standing unrepresented, as a man/woman. And government would lose control over them.

SCOTUS doesn't have authority to oversee a presidential election court case, except that it is brought by a man or woman who has been wronged. It's in the Constitution, though it is not clearly stated.

Learn the law. Use the law. If you don't use the law, but start a revolution when you could have used the law, the US has the duty to use the military to put you down.

Why are you so afraid of learning and using the law (as opposed to legal action) to settle things peaceably?

[fastlight]

Learn the law. Use the law. If you don't use the law, but start a revolution when you could have used the law, the US has the duty to use the military to put you down.

Start a revolution... what a big word, it's just the second american independence to create the 2nd american republic, nothing fancy, otherwise, there won't be a usa no more...

Why are you so afraid of learning and using the law (as opposed to legal action) to settle things peaceably?

Fundamentally you don't understand the situation, hide again in some kind of legal gibberish that only you understand to deny the reality, that all peaceful options have been exhausted, that the first american republic has fallen (not dramatic, it had to happen eventually) and it's time to simply chose, not me, as said, hyper happy with PRC / CCP / PLA / MSS... all good, don't need usa no more, I just find sad to have witnessed the final end of the american republic. I really liked it ! but you know... when there is no accountability... it's no secret what will happen. The rule of law has collapsed (burn loot and murder, or epsteingate, or the election steal, or 911 / wtc 7) so you can remain in your dream world and if you are happy like that, more power to you. As said, it's sad, it hadn't to be that ugly... but it can still get much worse...

Are the troops still guarding "fort nancy", I guess you can't even go the "scotus"? what a great nation... I saw the election steal on tv... after the peaceful protests... I saw it man. The steal... that's how america died. the final blow.

and the Destanis, Ronny? he went to yale law school, okay? and what did he sign into law? mandatory injections... it's not accident, I am just curious what did he got in return? something erased or something promised? who knows, but himself... when you think about it poor boy,... he saw 911, didn't even search or tried to understand what really happened this day, and jumped, for what?

soon

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/24/Flag_of_Taliban.svg/1200px-Flag_of_Taliban.svg.png

here :


https://www.khaama.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Afghan-flag-at-half-staff.jpg  

Meanwhile, while he was "touring" aka "defending freedom" by blowing and killing innocents afghans, american girls were raped by jeffrey epstein, based very near his current location... very revealing...

who said fool me once? shame on you ! fool me twice, shame on me? isn't it, even that too complicated, what a great thinkers... unworthy of the american dream.

edit : yeah yeah

https://static.ca-news.org/upload/ennews/5/660375.1625814733.b.jpg

[cmg777]

Besides Mike Lindell, Trump and the courts proving that the voting was rigged which many Americans believe it was due to the strange numbers coming in the night before, I'd say there are two other answers besides Trump or DeSantis.

Solution 1:

Note: I doubt this would happen because the state of Texas is run by Abbott that only cares about the fake stamps printed by the Fed everyday when he could be making his own money period and be on the new hundred dollar bill.

Basically the state of Texas secedes from the union. Texas is the only state in the union that can do this as it was never formally part of the union as it seceded during the Civil War and had its own government. Therefore, Texas could opt for what in crypto is known as a hard fork inviting other states to join it then more powerfully other counties in states not appearing to secede. The only things left not part of the new union would be Democrat run cities where we could kill the power and water to them and tell the residents to bring the traitors out to justice for their treasonous acts against the old United States.

Solution 2:

A person of George Washington's bloodline declares themselves king. After the revolutionary war, George Washington was told that he should become king. A gold wire crown was made for him so therefore, you could technically turn this country into a monarchy again.

The elite's solution:

A one world government where you own nothing, work for the corporation on a modern day plantation in an absolute neo-feudal system where you are tracked and traced. You have no freedoms and can be terminated by the state when they deem you a threat or outlive your usefulness becoming obsolete to a machine that can produce the same labors.

[fastlight]

Lindell : when a man wear a cross, I intuitively think it's another "born again" a la george bush, aka another scam pulled by the pedoziosatanists.
Trump : epstein. end.

now

S1

abbot, adler (austin) etc...

however, and I hope you know those word by heart :

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.


I think there is nothing more constitutional and american ! However, I think that those responsible in those blue encircled enclaves, I mean political establishement, secret and not so secret police, medias, have to be first executed by the asieged. call it the price of their liberation. it's not wasp territory no more.

S2 is a plant of the european aristocratie, don't fall in the trap, next stop, liberation of the england... to get a prince (cf pedogate > andrew, dead or alive).

[BADecker]

Lindell : when a man wear a cross, I intuitively think it's another "born again" a la george bush, aka another scam pulled by the pedoziosatanists.
Trump : epstein. end.

now

S1

abbot, adler (austin) etc...

however, and I hope you know those word by heart :

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.


I think there is nothing more constitutional and american ! However, I think that those responsible in those blue encircled enclaves, I mean political establishement, secret and not so secret police, medias, have to be first executed by the asieged. call it the price of their liberation. it's not wasp territory no more.

S2 is a plant of the european aristocratie, don't fall in the trap, next stop, liberation of the england... to get a prince (cf pedogate > andrew, dead or alive).

And when you have finished shutting government down, what  will you replace it with? More of the same, but worse? People fighting for their lives, and dying because the crooks that are around then will act more directly on the people?

Got a REAL plan?

Why not use the government as it is to force it to fight itself. It's right in the law how to do it. If you don't know how to use the law, why would anybody think that you know how to make things work after you get rid of government?

[fastlight]

Lindell : when a man wear a cross, I intuitively think it's another "born again" a la george bush, aka another scam pulled by the pedoziosatanists.
Trump : epstein. end.

now

S1

abbot, adler (austin) etc...

however, and I hope you know those word by heart :

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.


I think there is nothing more constitutional and american ! However, I think that those responsible in those blue encircled enclaves, I mean political establishement, secret and not so secret police, medias, have to be first executed by the asieged. call it the price of their liberation. it's not wasp territory no more.

S2 is a plant of the european aristocratie, don't fall in the trap, next stop, liberation of the england... to get a prince (cf pedogate > andrew, dead or alive).

And when you have finished shutting government down, what  will you replace it with? More of the same, but worse? People fighting for their lives, and dying because the crooks that are around then will act more directly on the people?

Got a REAL plan?

Why not use the government as it is to force it to fight itself. It's right in the law how to do it. If you don't know how to use the law, why would anybody think that you know how to make things work after you get rid of government?

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/atlantean_conspiracy/images/atlant117.jpg


https://humansarefree.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/012BLarry2BSilverstein2Bwtc.jpg

You don't understand slow death, as slave, plantation prisonner or camp interned, when do you think is the best day to fight? Of course the first, and even better way before then. Why? Because you still can (calorie wise). But don't worry little boy, it's not the stuff of muppets... they anyway get slaughtered.

.