That blog post doesn't explain a single thing you are doing to fight this; it just make a list of excuses as to why you are selling out, followed by a final two paragraphs reminding everyone how great you are for selling them out. Not to mention some very dubious statements it makes, such as:
The alternative, discontinuing zkSNACKs would have set back Bitcoin privacy for decades.
Lol. Decades? Bitcoin is only 13 years old but your wallet is so amazing that without it Bitcoin would have been set back decades? Come on.
Blacklisting by the default coordinator, while undesirable, is a small price to pay for the future of Bitcoin's privacy.
Right, because if you didn't start censoring people, then privacy as we know it would be over.
The zkSNACKs coordinator having a blacklist does not mean Wasabi Wallet monitors or collects user data.
No, you'll just hire a blockchain analysis company instead and get them to spy on people on your behalf, as your team stated on Telegram. Because I definitely want my coinjoin fees to go straight to a blockchain analysis company. Don't you just love paying people to spy on you?
You can't claim to be protecting privacy while also being pro-censorship, since to censor certain outputs you must first invade the privacy of everybody using your service. Even the users who aren't censored are being monitored by whatever blockchain analysis companies you hire to make sure they are being good little citizens, and they are paying for the privilege of being spied on.