Green trusted user vouching for shady site

[Stalker22]

I understand market I'm in, 20 BTC is limit per mix not whole balance of the mixer

A little reminder:

You are one more retard liar asshole. So when you sign you can't take those 20 BTC ?? WTF is this bullshit you are writing. You may sign and then easily take those 20 BTC same way.
~

This sounded like you don't want to sign so you don't compromise your cold storage, and it sounded like 20 BTC is your entire balance. But, apparently, you don't even have that much.

[JollyGood]

I understand market I'm in, 20 BTC is limit per mix not whole balance of the mixer

I don't want continue further discussions here, some of the updates will be on main topic also for forum deposits. Keep tracking if you want

It was a very convenient excuse for you to avoid answering questions, it is not a surprise you have decided to discontinue your discussions here.

Your website is incomplete: https://shaker.finance/#monitor

First, your Terms and Conditions refer to "Shaker.finance (the Service)" but there is no LLC/LTD therefore can you elaborate who is actually behind the mixer?

Second, your clauses mean you can scam anybody without fear of legal action therefore your website should be avoided by everybody:

4.3 Limitation of liability

TO THE FULL EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES NEITHER Shaker.finance NOR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, PARTNERS, VENDORS, LICENSORS ARE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, DELIBERATE OR OTHER DAMAGE (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGE BY LOST PROFIT, REVENUE, REPUTATION) OCCURRED WHEN USING THIS SERVICE.

I understand market I'm in, 20 BTC is limit per mix not whole balance of the mixer

Ok. So roughly how much BTC do you have to support the operation of your mixer? Can you sign a message from an address holding some part of those funds?

Perhaps you could also explain why your Terms of Service and Privacy Policy are plagiarized word for word from /en/terms/]https://[banned mixer]/en/terms/?
And perhaps you could also explain why your letters of guarantee all return a bad signature from Jambler's public key?

I doubt the funds exist, he cannot sign any wallet at all that demonstrates he has any funds.

[Poker Player]

First, your Terms and Conditions refer to "Shaker.finance (the Service)" but there is no LLC/LTD therefore can you elaborate who is actually behind the mixer?

Second, your clauses mean you can scam anybody without fear of legal action therefore your website should be avoided by everybody:

4.3 Limitation of liability

TO THE FULL EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES NEITHER Shaker.finance NOR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, PARTNERS, VENDORS, LICENSORS ARE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, DELIBERATE OR OTHER DAMAGE (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGE BY LOST PROFIT, REVENUE, REPUTATION) OCCURRED WHEN USING THIS SERVICE.

I understand market I'm in, 20 BTC is limit per mix not whole balance of the mixer

Ok. So roughly how much BTC do you have to support the operation of your mixer? Can you sign a message from an address holding some part of those funds?

Perhaps you could also explain why your Terms of Service and Privacy Policy are plagiarized word for word from /en/terms/]https://[banned mixer]/en/terms/?
And perhaps you could also explain why your letters of guarantee all return a bad signature from Jambler's public key?

I doubt the funds exist, he cannot sign any wallet at all that demonstrates he has any funds.

I see I was right to leave him negative trust, as any honest business would have addressed the issues raised in this thread convincingly in a couple of days at most.

His angry way of responding, not signing a message to show the funds the business have, the plagiarism, etc., show that this is either a scam about to happen or people managing this business are extremely unprofessional, and in neither case should people do business with them.

[JollyGood]

He has been active here in the forum after stating he was not going post here again but it was convenient for him to play that card because it coincided with him being asked to prove he had finances in place.

He refused to sign a wallet to show he was serious about his business, instead decided to victim play while still proclaiming he was operating a real business. He and his business are not to be trusted.

I see I was right to leave him negative trust, as any honest business would have addressed the issues raised in this thread convincingly in a couple of days at most.

His angry way of responding, not signing a message to show the funds the business have, the plagiarism, etc., show that this is either a scam about to happen or people managing this business are extremely unprofessional, and in neither case should people do business with them.