What is wrong with this? Can it be considered a signature?

[Lucius]

But he considers himself special, very close to the all-powerful creator, and if he wants to, he can move the BTC price up to $40k tomorrow

I still don't want to check his post history but want to guess. This is the user who were spamming on boards and asking he can influence BTC price?

That's right, it's enough to visit Speculation and look at his two threads on the first page, and everything will be clear to you. Personally, I have nothing against everyone expressing their opinion and views, but such posts should be on appropriate boards. Misleading forum members that one person can influence the price of something with his actions based on religious beliefs is, in my opinion, very suspicious behavior.

Can you show the links that mprep removed?

I can't say that what I archived is 100% what was deleted, but I am quite sure that it is identical content.

https://archive.ph/zPFYJ

[LoyceV]

https://archive.ph/zPFYJ

I get why that was deleted

Now compare mine, which I never even considered to be a "signature" (and was never questioned by a Mod).

[KingsDen]

You sound like a newbie that just registered an account yesterday. After all those years you still don't know that having signatures in the post area is not allowed. Use your available signature space. It's there for a reason. if you don't like it then there is nothing we can do here. That's you problem.

What you are trying to do is like seeing a designated toilet place but then you go and shit outside it claiming it's the right thing to do.

I have checked out the post and I did not see the signature that was asked to remove. Maybe I missed something or it's no longer available for viewing.
Ihave also checked Op and he is not wearing a paid signature
I am thinking that the only reason one would want to use text area for signature is to have a double signature space, maybe one (main sig space) for promoting the company that hired him while his improvised textarea signature space promotes his personal Project.

It iss not wise because if everyone begins to do that, it will turn spamming and contradictory to the main signature space. Besides, the personal text area is available for use.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

So, my solution to such issues is to include the links in my posts (only relevant posts) rather than placing them in the signature box/section and having them appearing in all my posts.  Do you see anything wrong in this? If yes, what exactly?

I strongly believe that when you visit Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc, you didn't go there to look at ads or to click on ads, but they still show you ads anyways, ads not even related to what you logged into either of the social medias to do...

For example, you can log on to Facebook to look at your friends newly posted pictures, as you scroll, Facebook will show you a man of God preaching, or a laptop for sale by someone who isn't even in your friends list, and at some point, you've found an ad that interested you and you clicked on it to find out more about that product... Was that what you went to Facebook to do?. The answer is No.

Advertising on this forum, ( like it is every where else) doesn't have to correlate with what is being discussed on that thread for the ad to show,  as the discussion is going on, and the ads showing, somebody might pick Interest to want to know more or even, the ad might be displaying some thing that user have been looking for for a long time...
So indeed, your argument holds no water, you are a senior member, go get a decent ad and wear.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

I have checked out the post and I did not see the signature that was asked to remove. Maybe I missed something or it's no longer available for viewing.
Ihave also checked Op and he is not wearing a paid signature

He's not wearing a signature, but he's adding a fake one in the post area, which is not allowed check this post ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5412147.0

[Mpamaegbu]

So, my solution to such issues is to include the links in my posts (only relevant posts) rather than placing them in the signature box/section and having them appearing in all my posts.  Do you see anything wrong in this? If yes, what exactly?

Yes, I see everything wrong with your suggestion. Let me ask simply, so what happens to the posts you make wearing certain signature when you change to another signature? Let's say, for instance, you get to promote a gambling project and you make all your posts only in gambling sections just to keep inline with the signature name and ideology, what happens when you move into a campaign that's anti-gambling? What then happens to all your gambling posts wearing a "pius" signature? Remember that what is displayed on users' profiles is the current signature they're signed on. So, by calculation what everyone sees is the current signature even on posts made years ago. Your suggestion won't work. It's going to be chaotic implementing it.