Well I see that OP has a somewhat peculiar list, honestly it is not because I am a faithful follower and that the word of stake.com spreads, but I think that they should be first, as soon as I saw the aspects that they take into account to make the review and to place it in the places, I don't think it's the right one, I understand that stake.com is one of the best casinos in the forum and it's from bitstars, it's really new to me and I think it's not here in the forum, so that is something that influences a lot, I did not see bitcasino.io, Duelbtis, Rollbit, Roobet in the selection that meet many of the characteristics that you take into account, betcoin.ag and playbetr seem good to me, it is only my opinion of course this.
The OP's list is not peculiar but it was common because if we browse other gambling review sites, we can see that they also prioritize casinos which are not found in this forum. I think the reason why they put stake casino in the second spot and bitstarz at first because it is stated that bitstarz has no withdrawal fees and then they have a massive 2.7k+ games.
Stake has a lot of games but I don't think their number crosses a thousand or more plus stake do also have a withdrawal fee but the fees can always be manageable if we use cheap altcoins and tokens. Another thing that stake don't have but bitstarz have is the sign up bonus or the deposit bonus.
Yes, in part it intrigues me sometimes to see casinos that are not in the forum, at first I review them because there are many casinos that are not crypto-style and that do not promote them through the forum, obviously who would tell them to put the option of crypto, for us it is always better to work with money in crypto, when it comes to fiat things can be very complicated, especially when transactions are made from other banks, the fact that they arrive, some have the options of Srill or Paypal, but I think that the main thing should be at least USDT, which is well accepted, Bitcoin or other crypto maybe not due to its high volatility and it can be understood, but in the same way those sites I don't know if they are so reliable.
Hi, I want to ask the author - why "top 5 casinos"? You should add more casinos, because it seems that this is a biased list. In my opinion fairspin and justbit should be on the list, I think those casinos are very good.
maybe you can request them to review your mentioned casinos. they have their own criteria as listed also on their page. for them, those are their top 5 casinos according to their criteria. every review or ranking site has their own top list depending on their reviews and experiences. so you can't expect that they will list casinos that you think are deserving on their list.
Of course what happens is that it is very difficult that with some criteria they do not coincide with those that are in the top 10 of the best casinos, there is always a lot of discrepancy and difference between what OP shows, for me there is no point of comparison, for sure stake.co, I see it well, Playbet and betcoin, I have seen other sites that are relatively new and I have also seen new threads that put a lot of mbitcasino, it may be a strong marketing campaign for this casino and they can manage to position it As one of the best in the forum, all publicity is worth it, but to compete with the big ones, it is also necessary to have some seniority.
