The way Chinese have been acting over the past decades (working with everyone and no one at the same time) is what I like to call the "Chinese Weasel Doctrine". It worked in the past but in each World War it works less and from what I've observed, like the US regime the Chinese are also incapable of changing their strategy. They will continue using the same thing even if it no longer works.
World War 3 (the Cold War between US and USSR)This is when the Weasel Doctrine worked best for them. Chinese economy was tiny and 85% of their population was living in absolute poverty. By acting like a weasel and playing both sides during the war but then shifting toward US near the end they benefited greatly. They could catapult their economy and their country because of that.
World War 4 (the US regime waging a war of terror on the world)The Weasel Doctrine worked here as well but to a lesser degree. The Chinese official have already admitted that what helped them greatly in this period to catch up with US economy/GDP was the fact that while US regime was wasting trillions in West Asia trying to destabilize the region to gain control but was being crushed by Iran and the Resistance (the War of Attrition), the Chinese were investing all that money in their economy and infrastructure.
US losing WW4 and China catching up may look positive on paper for them but in reality it made China enemy number one for US regime. That's not to mention all the opportunity they lost on solidifying an alliance and extending their strategic depth so that today they don't have to fight terrorists on their own soil. I'll explain in the next part:
World War 5 (today)Lets quickly look at Syria. The Western Propaganda Machine loves to repeat the same narrative over and over these days: "Assad was a dictator", "Assad was a dictator", "Assad was a dictator", "Assad was a dictator".... but repeating it a million times doesn't change facts.
The reason why Syria fell had very little to do with Assad and whether he was a dictator or not. The main reason was the hybrid war the West waged on Syria and their main weapon was economical. That is the economic terrorism;
something that China could have countered.I personally believe that the start of it goes back to the 1970's when I look at the Turkish "GAP" project. It is when the Zionist terrorists infiltrated Turkey and worked on Erdogan to carry out "water war" on the region specifically on Syria. Over the next years by blocking the water supply of Syria by building more dams on main rivers going into Syria, Erdogan caused a worsening water crisis and drought in Syria (also in Iraq) which eventually led to 8 million people (farmers, etc.) losing their jobs and having to displace.
On top of that the dirty war that US regime waged against Syrians, the sanctions (economic terrorism), their invasion and finally taking over the main source of revenue the Syrian government had (ie. their gas and oil) led to a worsening economic situation.
Consequently as people got poorer every year and without jobs they slowly joined radical/terrorist groups such as ISIL to be paid by the US government and not die of starvation.
Look at what happened in the past weeks. When a Syrian general is being paid like 20-40 bucks a month, he will not defend his country specially when he sees that US government is paying Takfiri terrorists in Idlib between 1000 to 2000 dollars a month! Instead the Syrian army joins those terrorists to be paid more so that they can feed their families (that's regardless of the fact that it doesn't work since many of them who were cooperating with the terrorists were executed by the same terrorists).
With that summary/history in mind, lets look at China and its "Weasel Doctrine".
This British mouthpiece is telling us what China's lack of action over the past 20-30 years means for them:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/12/13/uyghur-fighters-in-syria-vow-to-come-for-china-next/As I said, China is enemy number one. The reason why US regime decided to create a multi-national terrorist coalition (ie. what we saw in Syria) was to train them and then send each sub-group of the main terrorist organization back to their homelands and destabilize those countries this way.
For example the Chinese citizens (Uyghur radicals/terrorists) that were brought to Turkey to be trained by Erdogan and armed by NATO now have some experience in fighting and are high because of their supposed win in Syria. The followers of these terrorists back inside China seeing this win as they follow the terrorist outlets on social media (eg. Telegram channels of ISIS) will start their own terrorist cells with the help of Uyghur terrorists that are now being sent from Syria back to China.
Instead of acting lie a weasel, China could have come into Syria years ago and made an investment helping the Syrian economy (like they've already done in many other countries). That way Syria wouldn't have fallen and this multi-national terrorist group could have been neutralized before it turns into a global threat to China, Russia and Europe.
I believe this is one of the reasons why Iran pulled out of Syria as well. Without the presence of a super power like Iran inside Syria, the US proxies easily took over the country and now their threat becomes palpable for China. Specially
since these US proxies are made to also threaten the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative, something China has already spent a lot of money on and they desperately need it. Just watch what these terrorists will do in Caucasus and Central Asia in the near future.
In WW4 the US regime exhausted most of its resources (eg. the $12 trillion spent supporting terrorism across West Asia and North Africa) and lost that war to Iran and The Resistance. Today as Iran simply pulled out of Syria instead of spending more resources and Syria fell within days, the US regime that is caught with its metaphorical pants down has to now spend trillions more trying to survive the new War of Attrition (#WW5) in West Asia in the coming years. And as US regime waste more money as China gets farther ahead putting US behind (since China isn't wasting trillions), the US regime will perceive China as a bigger threat and China will be attacked more. This is when China will be forced to spend trillions trying to survive. And let's just say like other secular militaries, China is not even capable of fighting radical ideological Takfiri terrorists...
What the Telegraph is shamelessly admitting shows the US regime's future strategies of using these terrorists against China very clearly.
