First of all thank you for the great work you are doing with the wallet scrutiny, I just stumbled upon your thread while I was reading through this section. It is amazing how you started your journey since 2019 and have already sirupted lot of information about various wallets. I think CoinBase is now even worst at this point. The user base is has outgrown the previously published number which means there are more and more users who just want to use nice looking apps, with easy to handle request. I mean pick a wallet which is non custodial, they have basic UI, (though its advancing) people are not used to it somehow. May be they like to share their private keys with the custodial wallets. Sadly the number of such wallets is huge which makes us think there is such under education about the
"Not your keys, not your bitcoin".So because they point out that a custodial wallet is custodial, that custodial wallet attempted frivolous legal action because they didn't like someone pointing out that they are custodial?
We should clearly name those custodial wallets and tell more people to avoid using them.
WalletScrutiny received this legal actions two times so far, first time it was from
Mercado Bitcoin, and now they received it from
Foxbit.
Both of this services are located in Brazil, that makes me think there is some connection between them, and this was targeted attack.
I am sure this is targeted attack only. They are just trying to take down the information and do not want to get hampered with their brand. This is what makes them afraid. Since you are openly stating the information about the custodial wallets they would lose the client base. Not sure how you are going to fight back but definitely under information acts this isn't illegal. Good luck.